'. '

Search results

From APIDesign

You searched for Review

Jump to: navigation, search

There is no page titled "Review".

For more information about searching APIDesign, see Help.

Showing below up to 20 results starting with #1.


View (previous 20) (next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

No page title matches

Page text matches

  1. ThanksEveryone (7,465 bytes)
    40: ...k. She always sent me a PDF and I was supposed to review it. Usually I could not believe my eyes when seei...
  2. InvitationForReviewers (1,619 bytes)
    5: ...all your expertise in this area, be so kind as to review it?
    10: * '''Apr 17''' - '''Apr 23''' - review of [[Reviewers|the rest]], about 100 pages as wel...
    16: ...onvenience whether you want to participate in the review of this book.
  3. DaveKoelle (1,837 bytes)
    5: ... for your email. I appreciate the opportunity to review the
  4. MartinRinard (498 bytes)
    1: ...]] and [[empiricism]]. As a result I asked him to review the [[TheAPIBook]] before I published it:
  5. PeterAhe (265 bytes)
    4: and notoriously late on review feedback.
  6. JeffMcAffer (335 bytes)
    5: lot of airplane time... So, I will attempt to review everything you
  7. JesseGlick (745 bytes)
    1: ...al new APIs; refactor or deprecate existing APIs; review APIs created by others; and define the versioning...
  8. LibraryReExportIsNPComplete (12,129 bytes)
    89: One of the critiques raised during the LtU review (linked in external sources) is that the kind of ...
  9. OlderBlogPosts (111,273 bytes)
    494: ...merated the omissions on my [[IsGodAMathematician|review page]], including few notes about computer scienc...
    884: ...tance review and saw his work being adored by his review committee. Congratulation for getting the ''A'' m...
    1507: ==== The Most Insightful Review of "Practical API Design" ====
    1509: The longest, most detailed and insightful review I have seen so far has been written by [http://la...
    1583: ==== [[1stPublicReview|First Public Review]] of Practical API Design Book ====
  10. Reviewers (3,307 bytes)
    19: ...your comments to Part 1, now you have a chance to review something real, something that contains a lot exa...
    25: Finish your review by '''Apr 14, 2008''' please. Little delay is ok,...
  11. Blogs:JaroslavTulach:Theory (22,864 bytes)
    126: ...s of an [[APIReview]]. Either there is no code to review or there is too much code already written. The ''...
    128: ...r integration? Isn't that insulting? What kind of review one is supposed to perform then? Claim that the s...
    130: Maybe there is a way to handle such review as well. But it remains [[APIReview|to be seen]] ...
  12. APIReview (4,291 bytes)
    1: API Review is an essential element of [[Teamwork]] for every...
    5: ... should avoid when performing API or architecture review.
    6: ...e is too little to review or there is too much to review.
    25: as an [[API Patch]] is the best style of review. [[NetBeans]] call that [[netbeans:APIReviewSteps...
    32: ...and it is composed of ''inception'' and ''final'' review rounds.
  13. ThanksReviewers (12,358 bytes)
    3: ...PatrickKeegan|Patrick]], we needed few experts to review the content and catch and help eliminate silly mi...
    17: ... He helped start [[NetBeans]] and now he can also review the wisdom we generated over the years. I think i...
  14. 1stPublicReview (3,142 bytes)
    1: ...ly be seen in positive light. Thanks for the nice review, [http://72miles.com/blog/posts/practical-api-des...
    9: Thanks for such nice review and I am eagerly waiting to see more. Btw. if you...
  15. API has to be Correct (3,865 bytes)
    24: ...methods there! Today I started an [[APIReview|API review]] to provide simple I/O reading [[API]] (see issu...
  16. AlternativeBehavior (6,943 bytes)
    63: ... in his [http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3067 review]
  17. InfoQReview (12,017 bytes)
    55: ...t going bad. Also, the chapter introduces an "API Review" process, which
    56: the NetBeans team is following to review API changes before integration. This way we can p...
    68: ...two modes: the standard review and the fast-track review. The latter is
    75: The standard review is targeted at reviewing a whole new library or
    76: subsystem. It is a two-round review. Firstly, we review the concept. Then, if
  18. Blogs:JaroslavTulach:Daily Life:YetAnotherAwesomeReview (2,283 bytes)
    1: .../03/book-review-practical-api-design.html another review] of the [[TheAPIBook|Practical API Design]] book....
  19. LibraryWithoutImplicitExportIsPolynomial (10,196 bytes)
    61: Recent review of [[LibraryWithoutImplicitExportIsPolynomial|thi...
  20. Apache (3,410 bytes)
    1: ...7 and we are still donating. Right now there is a review of [[NetBeans]] sources in progress. Some reposit...
    5: ...ans-releases Git version]. Thanks Emilian! As the review isn't finished yet, and we are still using the [[...
    11: ...]]? I don't know, but [[I]] doubt. The [[Oracle]] review of the code reveals some problems (for example [h...

View (previous 20) (next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)



Search in namespaces:

List redirects
Search for
Views
Personal tools
buy