'. '

Impossible

From APIDesign

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Finite-state Machine)
(Finite-state Machine)
Line 11: Line 11:
== Finite-state Machine ==
== Finite-state Machine ==
-
This story requires you to understand what a [[wikipedia:Finite-state machine|Finite-state automaton]] is and how it differs in capabilities from a [[wikipedia:Pushdown_automaton|pushdown automaton]] or at least from [[wikipedia:Turing_machine|Turing machine]] - e.g. classical computer. This kind of knowledge should be approachable to every ''expert'' who studied computer science, or who studied lingustics and knows who [[wikipedia:Noam_Chomsky|Chomsky]] and [[wikipedia:Chomsky_hierarchy|his hierarchy]] is.
+
This story requires you to understand what a [[wikipedia:Finite-state machine|Finite-state automaton]] is and how it differs in capabilities from a [[wikipedia:Pushdown_automaton|pushdown automaton]] or at least from [[wikipedia:Turing_machine|Turing machine]] - e.g. classical computer. This kind of knowledge should be approachable to every ''expert'' who studied computer science, or who studied lingustics and knows who [[wikipedia:Noam_Chomsky|Chomsky]] and [[wikipedia:Chomsky_hierarchy|his hierarchy]] is. I heared the story when I was studying [[MFF UK]] by Michal Chytil, who at the time was not only computer scientist, but also partner of [[wikipedia:Anderson_Consulting|Anderson Consulting]] in our country and his stories about business vs. science relation were absolutely revealing.
Imagine your are an expert in the area of [[wikipedia:Finite-state machine|Finite-state automaton]]s. Your great reputation lead another potential customer to you and you are being asked to create a new [[wikipedia:Finite-state machine|Finite-state automaton]] that will:
Imagine your are an expert in the area of [[wikipedia:Finite-state machine|Finite-state automaton]]s. Your great reputation lead another potential customer to you and you are being asked to create a new [[wikipedia:Finite-state machine|Finite-state automaton]] that will:

Revision as of 07:11, 19 October 2014

Explaining something is impossible, is well, impossible. Or at least almost impossible as following few stories show.

You Are the Expert!

Following viral video demonstrates the principle:

You are the expert! Can you do it? And don't tell us it is impossible, as that can only be explained as your own incapability.

Finite-state Machine

This story requires you to understand what a Finite-state automaton is and how it differs in capabilities from a pushdown automaton or at least from Turing machine - e.g. classical computer. This kind of knowledge should be approachable to every expert who studied computer science, or who studied lingustics and knows who Chomsky and his hierarchy is. I heared the story when I was studying MFF UK by Michal Chytil, who at the time was not only computer scientist, but also partner of Anderson Consulting in our country and his stories about business vs. science relation were absolutely revealing.

Imagine your are an expert in the area of Finite-state automatons. Your great reputation lead another potential customer to you and you are being asked to create a new Finite-state automaton that will:

Recognize words composed from 0 and 1 alphabet letters.
Accept words that start with some number of 0 and are followed by the same number of 1.
Reject all other words.

Your new automaton should then accept word like "01" or "000000000111111111" and reject words like "10" or "00010" or "001". What should you say to such customer?

TBD

Personal tools
buy