Talk:Erasure

come on man, what's the point of having 7 links to the same one page in rss item for this page

--OlegYch 21:39, 19 October 2011 (CEST)

I have been a Java and C++ developer for more years than I would like to admit. A rencet career move has led me into a .Net- only world. Your statement about Java as a language being crusty, C# is better, but Java has the best libraries, resonated with me. When you work exclusively in the .Net realm, the sense of open source community is essentially non-existent when compared with the Java community. Sure, you have codeplex and a few other MS sponsored efforts...but it's simply not the same.However, in this situation you can have your cake and eat it too. Your statement "If you could write C# code with Java libraries, you'd really have something". Well, you can to a large degree with IKVM. It really does work, it's technically sound, and since Sun opened the Java runtime, it's even more practical. The efforts of the folks behind GNU Classpath made IKVM viable many years ago. Try IKVM out on your favorite Java library and I think you will be impressed.

--Nanda 05:18, 21 October 2013 (CEST)

Great post, Neal.As a language fan, it's fun to gaze on this list, but what raelly gets my attention is that you are _using_ Ruby.That scores big props from me because you are dealing with real world issues: teams, installs, packaging, unit testing, etc.As language amateurs (recall that amateur is, loosely, 'lover of' in French), it is easy to say 'oh language X would be a blast'. But often that is for home projects; it is seductively easy to ignore all the logistic details of a real project. e.g. I have no idea how I would package a Lisp app. (I'm sure one can but usually I think of lambdas, not 'how do i deploy').Mikeps. Count me in the Python camp!

--Cadeaux 10:16, 21 October 2013 (CEST)

Love your list and mostly agree, but I would swap Python and Ruby [I like pyohtn a lot!]Just for the record, however, the loom is spelled Jacquard. If you're interested, gets you to a company that makes jacquard looms for hand weavers (a truly cool tool for us weavers if only the $'s were there (sigh))And jacquard designs are done with one of several very nice CAD programs, so programming a jacquard is quite easy (no, you don't have to do it in the loom equivalent of assembly language) Dale (who weaves when he gets a chance)

--Emy 10:26, 21 October 2013 (CEST)

I was hoping the the syatnx was optional. >List words = new ArrayList();Might be more convient than casting for add/retrieveing operations for items in the collection.There is tons of existing code that does not use that syatnx. Hopefully, you can still cast when you need too and compile existing source code with out a deprication flag.

--Yuvraj 15:24, 21 October 2013 (CEST)

I want to thank the blogger very much not only for this post,but also for his all puoeivrs efforts.I found this Google search to be greatly interesting.I will be coming back to your site for more information. startIndex

--Moha 18:06, 21 October 2013 (CEST)

The forum is a brghiter place thanks to your posts. Thanks!

--Ale 18:40, 21 October 2013 (CEST)

public int[] frontPiece(int[] nums) { if (nums.length < 3) { // if length 2 or shtorer it will return array return nums; } int[] a = {nums[0], nums[1]}; // make new array with 1st and 2nd integer from nums array return a; // return new array}

--Popol 21:54, 21 October 2013 (CEST)

That would be because all nermubs in javascript are actually 64 bit floating point.Not all integers higher than 53 bits can be exactly represented as a 64 bit floating point value, hence 0 20000000000000 and 0 20000000000001 are the same.This is due to the 11 bit exponent and the 1 sign bit. This only leaves 52 bits to store the fraction

--Jennifer 22:08, 21 October 2013 (CEST)

I'd be happy just to break out of the Delphi rut let alone actually use a dynmaic language. I have C# experience and consider myself more than competent, but the PHBs in charge of hiring always discount me because I don't have direct experience in some particular nuance of .Net development (none of the criteria I've encountered during interviews are worth a crap).I just may end up transitioning to my 3rd job in a row based primarily on a dead language I despise - Delphi.

--Lizbeth 23:57, 21 October 2013 (CEST)

I found it interesting that on your scputrem you have two "pure" models of computation at different ends of the scputrem (LISP and Turing machine). Of course, LISP isn't really Lambda Calculus anymore, so it may be unfair. Still.No Erlang? No Visual Basic 9? No "a language I've designed myself"?Further, I gotta say - I'd flip 1s and 0s any day over "programming" the Loom - which would have involved manually punching holes in cards with 18th century tech.

--Maliaka 00:09, 22 October 2013 (CEST)

I'm not easily imseepsrd but you've done it with that posting.

--Lorrie 01:31, 22 October 2013 (CEST)

A spectrum ilepims a single dimension. Surely choice of language depends on the task at hand. Different tasks are better served by different languages. None of those you list are good for constraint programming, small devices, driving hardware, parallel programming or computationally intensive highly mathematical programming. Where is Prolog, Mercury, C, GLSL, Cg, NesC, Fortran, J or K, for example, all of which have their niches?

--Jack 01:55, 22 October 2013 (CEST)

Wow! Great thgiinnk! JK

--Diana 05:35, 22 October 2013 (CEST)

Definitely some very good stuff in here, notable 43 50 mitenis on Kovers 5, should press up a cd pack for these as the cover art is great fun. Exceptionally wide use of sampling overall the whole set creates the air of relaxation and down time that the bank does whilst keeping you captivated in the most basic of musical ideas. the voice overs create a story through out.. nice piece of work.

--Ngoc 05:45, 22 October 2013 (CEST)

Traffic Mayhem Review- Very special Article! My prnater and i had been only contemplating that there is too much absolutely wrong advice on this topic area you certainly revitalized my best judgement. Many thanks for a beautiful posting.

--Love 11:40, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

First, let me commend your plduecility on this subject. I am not a pro during this subject, but after reading your write-up, my knowledge has developed substantially. Please tolerate me to catch your rss nourish to remain in contact with any upcoming revisions. Pleasant career and will offer it on to pals and my weblog audience.

--Mang 11:59, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

Traffic Mayhem- A actually exnlcleet publish by you my friend. I've bookmarked this page and will arrive back following several days to verify for any new posts that you simply make.

--Marilea 12:01, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

you mention in your blog "There is not much in this resalee except JDK7 feature, no new feature has been introduced which will probably be resaleed in either 3.8 or 4.2". What do you think that which version will resaleed and when it will.

--Larissa 12:33, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

I am in total agreement as well. As a matetr of fact even if your job title in past positions wasn't considered attractive enough or comprehensive of your duties customizing your resume can be a reflection of those skills. Don't take for granted to over achievements accomplished or the looked over skills you gained in past positions. Highlight them and toot your horn. Show you are worthy of a promotion this is probably why you are out there. To get out the box and act in spite of fear. Go for credentialing if needed to validate your expertise.

--Anmar 12:35, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

I came, I read this article, I corueenqd.

--Rider 13:09, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

It's like you're on a miisosn to save me time and money!

--Masha 13:29, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

A rolling stone is worth two in the bush, thanks to this artlcie.

--Encus 13:30, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

why can't you make all 3 choices at once:-Save Page as MHTML-save html-save whole pawehgy ony MHTML or only 2 last variants?

--Naoto 13:33, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

Alknizaam-iaformataon found, problem solved, thanks!

--Sneha 13:50, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

I thank you humbly for shnirag your wisdom JJWY

--Roberta 14:16, 23 October 2013 (CEST)

ArrayList to HashSet conversion is my most prreeerfd method to remove duplicates from collection if Insertion order is not concern, as insertion order gets lost when you copy elements form ArrayList to HashSet. if you still wants to use HashSet to remove duplicates and want to keep the insertion order of List than consider using LinkedHashSet.

--Cody 14:22, 23 October 2013 (CEST)