Blogs:JaroslavTulach:Practical Design
From APIDesign
Practical Design
XML, Schema, SAX. @Annotations!
Some say that code completion with annotations is not big improvement. XML can have code completion too if we give XML Schema with it. I disagree! Anyone to comment on that?
--JaroslavTulach 10:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Extend Inextensible!
Interfaces are not extensible. Learn how to extend them!
--JaroslavTulach 11:31, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Try to Steal my Object!
Recently my cousin was teasing my mind with a question whether there is a way to make anything private in Javascript. I may be wrong, but I think there is: Is there anyone who can steal and modify my internal impl object?
--JaroslavTulach 04:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Plug into Your Compiler! Optimize Your Framework by Generating Compile Time Caches.
Learn how to generate CompileTimeCaches with a little help of source-only annotations and their AnnotationProcessors.
--JaroslavTulach 14:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Victims of Conceptual Surface
Do you know how to eliminate classes with too many dependencies like java.beans.Beans? You need to Sneak in Simplicity!
--JaroslavTulach 16:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Splitting applet and beans via CodeInjection
I have a basic infrastructure to split the JDK which could be useful in your project as well. Also I managed to successfully split java.beans and java.applet packages.
--JaroslavTulach 12:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Help me modularize JDK
Creating modular JDK while keeping compatibility with the existing monolithic one may be tricky. Will you help me find right way to do it?
--JaroslavTulach 20:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Everyone is equal. Except Power Users.
Learn to design Privileged API suitable for power users of your library. Don't forget to listen to podcast #3.
--JaroslavTulach 17:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Double Injection. Loosely Coupled SpringFramework.
I have just finished the bridge between Spring and Lookup (originally written by AndreiBadea) and prepared a demo application to demonstrate what it can be useful for.
--JaroslavTulach 04:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Clear Definition of Version
Interfaces are absolutely perfect tool to achieve ClearDefinitionOfVersion. A curious reader question made me write the ClearDefinitionOfVersion page - many thanks for your talkback.
--JaroslavTulach 19:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Lookup is Free!
Time to pickup cherries! Nobody can know what happens to NetBeans after the Sun/Oracle acquisition. Better to be ready for everything and save the NetBeans API pieces that make sense outside of the project boundaries. One of them is Lookup. I am proud to announce that Lookup has new home now: lookup.apidesign.org. Welcome the refugee and let me know if there is a way I could improve the library.
--JaroslavTulach 05:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
D2D: Factory instances are more flexible than factory classes
As part of Designers To Designers section on this website I seem to have a unique chance to introduce Factory instances are more flexible than factory classes article by (yet) unknown designer. Enjoy, talk back.
--JaroslavTulach 08:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Can there Be Implement Only Interface?
Here is my answer to question that I got by parren.
--JaroslavTulach 18:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Application Context in Ruby
Recently I've noticed a lot of activity in the apidesign.org wiki. Perfect. Inspite it is more posts than I can handle.
However I am thankful for all your comments and I hope this wiki can become a place for exchange of ideas between people interested in API design. For example, Steve Shapero added a note about his will to seek for Application Context implementation in Ruby. I personally cannot be really useful, as my knowledge of the Ruby language is quite basic, but maybe some of you will join Steve's effort.
PS: Let us know how it went. You know, I feel that Ruby's duck-typing and API contracts may not be mutually strengthening...
--JaroslavTulach 19:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Get Rid of Multi-Meaning Classes
In the latest example related to modifiers, I'll explain how to achieve even more clarity than advocated by EliminateFuzzyModifiers essay. Today we are going to eliminate multi-meaning classes!
--JaroslavTulach 16:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Eliminate Fuzzy Modifiers!
Time for new post about modifiers. My recent take on access modifiers generated quite a bit of interest. I've received a bunch of comments and I am thankful for all of them! I've learned about approaches taken by different languages, I've started to think about my future, but more importantly Arno Nyhm asked me to:
- please show not only a bad example for the Factorial
- but also a good solution for this implementation.
At your wish Arno! Enjoy (almost) real world example how to EliminateFuzzyModifiers! And let me know what you think.
--JaroslavTulach 20:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Time to Fix Java Access Modifiers!
I have an open letter to designers of Java language for JDK7: Can you please make Java modifiers API-friendly?
--JaroslavTulach 22:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Co-exist in Peace! Accept Alter Ego.
APIs age and from time to time they get into so bad state that they need an alternative reimplementation. At that time one has to face a dilemma: Keep BackwardCompatibility or break it and improve the API? As AlternativeBehaviour page explains there is no contradiction between these two. One can deliver improvements while retaining BackwardCompatibility. All that is needed to teach the API to accept its Alter Ego.
--JaroslavTulach 16:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Beware Exposing Yourself to Public!
Erwin Vervaet asked me to provide an explanatory example:
- I have a question regarding chapter 11, section "Pitfalls of Java Monitors".
- Could you please provide an example illustrating the problem, where
- subclasses interfere with the parent class's monitors?
It took me a while to expose that example, but here finally is my newest page talking about Pitfalls of Java Monitors.
--JaroslavTulach 10:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Try, catch, and don't give up!
When your call to a method generates an exception, what can you do? Print warning and give up? Yes, often. Unless the TryCatchRedo pattern is in use!
--JaroslavTulach 15:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Accept Unacceptable!
When you maintain some code and you get a patch that you do not like, what can you do? Is the only option to refuse the change, or is there a better way? Of course, as this was just a rhetorical question, there is better solution: Just create a code slot!
--JaroslavTulach 21:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Singletonize your own Factories!
I am reading my own book and I've just got to page that talks about a pattern called among the NetBeans team Singletonizer. TheAPIBook describes it with a small note, but as I think it is very useful, I've just created a dedicated page describing it in more detail, giving it more, well deserved, publicity.
--JaroslavTulach 16:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Wizard is the best API
There is a nice discussion provoked by description of my manifest advantures. It reminds me once again how important tools are. As I wrote somewhere in TheAPIBook, I guess it is in Chapter 9, one of the best APIs is wizard. Good wizard can turn any API, regardless how bad, into perfectly shining, beautiful star. Good tools make everything easier.
--JaroslavTulach 13:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Builder vs. Cumulative Factory
Is Builder better pattern than CumulativeFactory? As Radim and Paulo pointed out, it might be. However from my point of view, it is an extension to the previous one! Read more and help us decide...
--JaroslavTulach 13:02, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Cumulative Factory API Design Pattern
Dear API writers, let me introduce you to cumulative factory API Design Pattern. Read more...
--JaroslavTulach 15:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
How Many People Have to Die leakages
Recently I've been warned that my sidebar in Chapter 4, Ever Changing Targets talks about events that are completely ununderstandable for international readers. That made me write a short essay about leakages of cultural contexts and the similarities with the API Design.
--JaroslavTulach 05:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Exceptions in API
Casper Bang asked following question about exceptions in API after reading the TheAPIBook:
I was curious as to know how come, in a book strictly about API design in Java, you do not mention exceptions (particular checked exceptions) and the role they play in documenting assertions vs. hampering versionability. Did you simply think this to be too controversial an issue I wonder?
Good question! Inspiring. Here are my current answers: exceptions in API.
--JaroslavTulach 21:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Have You Ever Wondered?
Many people want to know, before they start to read a book, whether it can help them solve some problems they have faced. That is very likely reason why many books start with have you ever wondered sections. The Practical API Design book does not contain such section itself, however that in no way means that there it is not helping to solve problems! You can bet that there is a lot of useful advices! The book is a lab journal describing adventures of NetBeans project and as such, it is almost completely stuffed with problem solutions. Here is short online version of Have You Ever Wondered to demonstrate that. Visit the page and check yourself what problems can TheAPIBook solve for you!
--JaroslavTulach 20:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Request/Response Pattern Revisited
Here is few additional thoughts about Request/Response which did not make it into TheAPIBook's explanation of Request/Response pattern.
--JaroslavTulach 21:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Follow
