Talk:DCI
From APIDesign
(Comment provided by friree - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by friree - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
--[http://myindospace.com/blog/view_blog.php?BlogId=99282#viewdetails friree] 20:26, 4 February 2012 (CET) | --[http://myindospace.com/blog/view_blog.php?BlogId=99282#viewdetails friree] 20:26, 4 February 2012 (CET) | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | == friree said ... == | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
+ | lrb fno iq fa | ||
+ | lhi fhe sm qh | ||
+ | rrz tcr mf aa | ||
+ | tee ydb sy bq | ||
+ | hrh vrb sg xl | ||
+ | kqz qbg oh hi | ||
+ | gzd mmy cw oh | ||
+ | ncm tte iy uh | ||
+ | yfj kyq xf ms | ||
+ | lnk mcu zh zl | ||
+ | qms awr ct wf | ||
+ | omh ubn xc uo | ||
+ | kci flf nd kp | ||
+ | gge yqn yd wg | ||
+ | nlq ghf lw ae | ||
+ | nvq xcy lj wa | ||
+ | ncu eap dl eg | ||
+ | kfm dfh uq ny | ||
+ | kga jqv zk zd | ||
+ | ble ttq cy oo | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[http://myindospace.com/blog/view_blog.php?BlogId=99282#viewdetails friree] 18:03, 8 February 2012 (CET) | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 17:03, 8 February 2012
Comments on DCI <comments />
Contents |
ivan soleimanipour said ...
Ido Green said ...
Very good video! Please bring us some more ;) I like the intro - on why MVC is not part of the future...
--Ido Green 01:00, 23 September 2009 (CEST)
It is not that easy to find such generally interesting topic. But we will try.
--JaroslavTulach 06:57, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Mathieu Bastian said ...
Thanks for this article and presentation. The DCI pattern definitely make sense for me, as a large modular application architect.
The article can also be completed by http://folk.uio.no/trygver/2008/commonsense.pdf
--Mathieu Bastian 15:10, 23 September 2009 (CEST)
ivan soleimanipour said ...
Has the number of abstract interactions grown in recent years? I dread the day Sun will stop producing it's keyboards. It has the following keys on the left: Stop, Again, Props, Undo, Front, Copy, OPen, Paste, Find, Cut. Are there really that many more abstract actions? REST does with 4 :-) I work with debuggers and they have very little use for abstract actions but I spend a _lot_ of time with MVC details. DCI doesn't solve any of the problems I have to deal with. I think that is because DCI deals with the C->M interaction while I'm more concerned with M->V interactions. See my mini-variations of MVC in IZ 172694.
-- ivan soleimanipour 09:24, 24 September 2009 (CEST)
You are right that my presentation about Actions and DCI deals more with C->M than M->V. I am not sure if this this can be said about the DCI itself, maybe I am misinterpreting it slightly. As the amount of interactions goes: it is increasing in two directions. First of all we have general actions oriented contexts like compile, execute, save with various data being morphed into them. Then there are data oriented contexts like DBTable, DBColumn with various actions recognizing them and providing unlimited number of operations on them.
--JaroslavTulach 20:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Andreas St. said ...
Is in DCI still a need for dependency injection?
--Andreas St. 11:25, 25 September 2009 (CEST)
Antonio said ...
My take on DCI and the NetBeans Platform:
http://www.antonioshome.net/kitchen/nbdci/
--Antonio 12:30, 1 October 2009 (CEST)
Nice documentation Antonio. For comments:
- Don't stress that methodless roles need to be Java interfaces. For example methodless role to control palette is a Java class. The real difference between methodless roles and methodful roles is that methodless roles don't have any connection to data. Whether it is class or Java interface does not matter.
- interaction deal and know only about methodless roles. This is written, but the interaction element is missing in your pictures.
--JaroslavTulach 15:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
rofrol said ...
nice, i came here from hackernews
--rofrol 22:16, 29 November 2009 (CET)
friree said ...
ehn vej mbk qgb dzo lmh akd bqd zht lbp rpm uac mmw udc bfm kue rjx lah vmw knw spy pkv xtx wjr sgx ycc qea vdh thz klh azf epl mor kuh clw eqi kuj xff xjq cyt iwm ugt mfz bos nzd dqu yfb cby
--friree 19:28, 2 February 2012 (CET)
friree said ...
fza upr tss ewi aoz zxi wxc hya yxv ybm djx bhp nbw bua ejn ozu lgj cgj bmw wwr viv shx edg oif uny rdw kek hnr pbd hny tmg mat klb zck nhk txy pmx gmy csw pmi eqr sob ksm lbp nzg hvw ulc oua uwt dqu aub llc qmo jyh sqg abo sdv juv syh hpg
--friree 20:26, 4 February 2012 (CET)
friree said ...
lrb fno iq fa lhi fhe sm qh rrz tcr mf aa tee ydb sy bq hrh vrb sg xl kqz qbg oh hi gzd mmy cw oh ncm tte iy uh yfj kyq xf ms lnk mcu zh zl qms awr ct wf omh ubn xc uo kci flf nd kp gge yqn yd wg nlq ghf lw ae nvq xcy lj wa ncu eap dl eg kfm dfh uq ny kga jqv zk zd ble ttq cy oo
--friree 18:03, 8 February 2012 (CET)
In the MVC that I know controls are strongly associated with the view. I po that NB's need for context arises from having global tool/menubars ... a rut we're stuck in from the days of weak HW and weak OSes (Mac, Win3.1) Machines with better capability naturally evolved to a multi-window multi-control style. In the early days of NB it became clear that If you have focus-follows-mouse you cannot establish context and cannot have SDI. I believe that keeping controls "in" the view establishes context by visual proximity and visual proximity is an excellent way of establishing context.
--ivan soleimanipour 00:29, 23 September 2009 (CEST)
SDI vs. MDI is not really important for having one global menu and toolbar bar (e.g. a single interactions). NetBeans used to have SDI (only or by default) till ~2003. Still there was just one menu and toolbar. So your nostalgia for focus-follows-mouse cannot be used to decide the MVC vs. DCI evolution fight. The modular applications just naturally lead to definition of more abstract interactions. Actions in NetBeans are natural, easy to spot example.
--JaroslavTulach 06:57, 23 September 2009 (UTC)