Talk:Netbinox
From APIDesign
(Difference between revisions)
(Comment provided by Ron Pomeroy - via ArticleComments extension) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
--Ron Pomeroy 22:16, 20 December 2011 (CET) | --Ron Pomeroy 22:16, 20 December 2011 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hello Ron, well the speedup is provided by six [[NetBeans]] modules and [[Equinox]] would need to take them, which is unlikely to happen. Anyway, I am supposed to visit [[OSGiCon]] in April 2012 talking about [[Netbinox|the fastest OSGi container on the planet]], and I think your suggestion will be discussed there. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 22:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 22:37, 21 December 2011
Comments on Netbinox <comments />
CNA Training said ...
Ron Pomeroy said ...
|| Because: why would you use Equinox when || Netbinox is fully compatible and much faster?
Because it would be work to replace Equinox everywhere it's used in my toolchain. Please consider sharing the love and donate to Equinox
Thanks,
Ron
--Ron Pomeroy 22:16, 20 December 2011 (CET)
Hello Ron, well the speedup is provided by six NetBeans modules and Equinox would need to take them, which is unlikely to happen. Anyway, I am supposed to visit OSGiCon in April 2012 talking about the fastest OSGi container on the planet, and I think your suggestion will be discussed there.
--JaroslavTulach 22:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Follow
Hey there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to look it over. I'm definitely enjoying the information. I'm book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Terrific blog and superb style and design.
--CNA Training 08:27, 12 December 2011 (CET)