Talk:JavaFX
From APIDesign
(Difference between revisions)
(Comment provided by Tim Boudreau - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Toni Epple - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
--Tim Boudreau 08:08, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | --Tim Boudreau 08:08, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Toni Epple said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | Sounds really great. What is the current state of this? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --Toni | ||
| + | |||
| + | --Toni Epple 09:10, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 07:10, 18 April 2013
Comments on JavaFX <comments />
bbaker said ...
Tim Boudreau said ...
While JavaFX is young, how about using SecurityManager to completely ban any sort of file or network I/O from its event thread? That would eliminate an entire category of the worst sort of UI bugs.
--Tim Boudreau 08:08, 18 April 2013 (CEST)
Toni Epple said ...
Sounds really great. What is the current state of this?
--Toni
--Toni Epple 09:10, 18 April 2013 (CEST)
Follow
I, for one, will be watching the integration of this mainline JDK. Wish this had happened years ago.
--bbaker 16:53, 2 June 2012 (CEST)