Talk:Netbinox
From APIDesign
(Difference between revisions)
(Comment provided by Thomas - via ArticleComments extension) |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 22:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 22:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 06:58, 17 October 2012
Comments on Netbinox <comments />
|| Because: why would you use Equinox when || Netbinox is fully compatible and much faster?
Because it would be work to replace Equinox everywhere it's used in my toolchain. Please consider sharing the love and donate to Equinox
Thanks,
Ron
--Ron Pomeroy 22:16, 20 December 2011 (CET)
Hello Ron, well the speedup is provided by six NetBeans modules and Equinox would need to take them, which is unlikely to happen. Anyway, I am supposed to visit OSGiCon in April 2012 talking about the fastest OSGi container on the planet, and I think your suggestion will be discussed there.
--JaroslavTulach 22:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)