Talk:OrderOfElements
From APIDesign
(Difference between revisions)
(Comment provided by Deanna - via ArticleComments extension) |
m (Reverted edits by 46.29.248.193 (Talk); changed back to last version by JaroslavTulach) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 16:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 16:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
Current revision
Comments on OrderOfElements <comments />
mbien said ...
Hello Michael, I've been told that TestNG supports ordering of tests. Kent replied to me that methods in JUnit test class should rather be independent. As far as the RFE for JUnit goes - right, Jesse created one. Actually, what Jesse suggest is to sort test methods alphabetically.
--JaroslavTulach 16:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Follow
looks like a RFE for junit to me. I agree the execution order of test methods should not change between runs. something like @After("test5") or @Test("2") would solve it in most cases IMO. I always had the habit to sort the result of getMethods() alphabetically (method name+parameters concatenated) in my libs (mostly code generators) since i knew this might happen some time in the future.
thanks for the heads up!
--mbien 01:15, 23 August 2011 (CEST)