Reviewers

From APIDesign

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Practical Design)
Current revision (07:00, 14 June 2008) (edit) (undo)
(Daily Life and the Future)
 
Line 38: Line 38:
Dear Reviewers.
Dear Reviewers.
-
Thanks for your comments in [[ReviewPartII]]. I'll start to process them now. Meanwhile I can offer you part III. I am looking forward to your comments. Please provide them by '''April 23, 2008'''. Btw. do not forget to get latest [[Sources]].
+
Thanks for your comments to Part 2. I'll start to process them now. Meanwhile I can offer you Part 3. I am looking forward to your comments. Please provide them by '''April 23, 2008'''. Btw. do not forget to get latest [[Sources]].

Current revision

Contents

Reviewers

Reviews and comments of pre-published versions of the book have been provided by many good reviewers and hopefully helped me eliminate trivial mistakes. I could not address all the comments, that would mean quite a big rewrite of the whole book. I may do it when I write another one, still I believe that the reviewers helped me a lot to make the book a better book.

Theory and Justifications

Please read the part and provide your comments here by Apr 3, 2008. Sections prefixed with Image:Ok.png are already processed. If you modify a section marked as Image:Ok.png, let User:JaroslavTulach know as I have already processed them and I might overlook your comments.

Practical Design

Dear Reviewers Thanks for your comments to Part 1, now you have a chance to review something real, something that contains a lot examples and also a lot of claims that need to be validated or invalidated.

Keep in mind that grammar changes are not something that I will apply. That is task for my publisher. More than them I am interested in your insight in various technologies that I refer to, but I am not real expert in. If anyone feels there is something about XML, bytecode manipulation, etc. that I do not interpret correctly, please make a note.

Another thing that I'd like you to verify is how easy it is to work with Sources. Are they connected well with the text of the book? Do you know what to do with them? Can you run them, study the sources, debug them? Is there any aspect that they miss and that should be improved? It is especially important to identify things that need to be done before publishing the book, those others can simply be improved later.

Finish your review by Apr 14, 2008 please. Little delay is ok, but the sooner the better:

Daily Life and the Future

Dear Reviewers.

Thanks for your comments to Part 2. I'll start to process them now. Meanwhile I can offer you Part 3. I am looking forward to your comments. Please provide them by April 23, 2008. Btw. do not forget to get latest Sources.


Personal tools
buy