Talk:DXR3
From APIDesign
(Difference between revisions)
(Comment provided by Brady - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Rob in KC - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--[http://www.getridofmanboobstoday.net/ Brady] 06:24, 29 June 2012 (CEST) | --[http://www.getridofmanboobstoday.net/ Brady] 06:24, 29 June 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Rob in KC said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | Hey, I was given a Hollywood plus card recently and was unable to get the modules to compile before I found your patches. Thanks for the translation of old to new kernel calls. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the DXR/Hplus was being actively supported today, I wonder if it would be in DVB or V4L(2). I kind of think those two subsystems are going to get merged in the future and there will be (yet) another round of backwards incompatibilities to deal with. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks again!!! | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | --Rob in KC 18:20, 26 March 2013 (CET) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 26 March 2013
Comments on DXR3 <comments />
Brady said ...
Rob in KC said ...
Hey, I was given a Hollywood plus card recently and was unable to get the modules to compile before I found your patches. Thanks for the translation of old to new kernel calls.
If the DXR/Hplus was being actively supported today, I wonder if it would be in DVB or V4L(2). I kind of think those two subsystems are going to get merged in the future and there will be (yet) another round of backwards incompatibilities to deal with.
Thanks again!!!
--Rob in KC 18:20, 26 March 2013 (CET)
Follow
Do you have a spam issue on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; many of us have created some nice procedures and we are looking to trade methods with others, why not shoot me an e-mail if interested.
--Brady 06:24, 29 June 2012 (CEST)