Paradoxes

From APIDesign

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 31: Line 31:
* Reuse complicates use. TBD.
* Reuse complicates use. TBD.
* Improve by remove. E.g. [[DiamondsVsStars|APIs are like stars]].
* Improve by remove. E.g. [[DiamondsVsStars|APIs are like stars]].
-
* API design [[guidelines]].
 
The above is your [[API]] design hand book reference. Deeper understanding of the topic can be obtained by reading [[TheAPIBook]]. Don't wait and get it [http://buy.apidesign.org here]!
The above is your [[API]] design hand book reference. Deeper understanding of the topic can be obtained by reading [[TheAPIBook]]. Don't wait and get it [http://buy.apidesign.org here]!
 +
 +
* Apendix: API design [[guidelines]].

Revision as of 18:59, 19 September 2011

Soon after publishing Kant's Critique, he realized that nobody is able to read it all and he released his Prolegomena to summarize and re-explain in more understandable style the thoughts of his Critique. I'd like to my Paradoxes to do the same to TheAPIBook with the hope to attract wider audience to the topic of API design and convince part of them that is is worth to buy TheAPIBook.


There is nothing unnatural on paradoxes. Yet they attract human attention. They show where our expectation does not match reality. And that is exactly the place where we can learn something new. That is why let's concentrate on paradoxes.

A clasification of an API paradox is going to be 3 to 10 pages long and should contain:

  • name
  • description of the original expectation
  • explanation how it works in reality of API design
  • contra-opinion
  • advice what to do
  • warning what can go wrong, if you don't
  • link to additional sources of informations (books, chapters, URLs)

The list of paradoxes should mention following ones:

The above is your API design hand book reference. Deeper understanding of the topic can be obtained by reading TheAPIBook. Don't wait and get it here!

Personal tools
buy