Talk:LiveDB

From APIDesign

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Comment provided by Russ White - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 18: Line 18:
</div>
</div>
-
Nice. I am glad I could motivate someone who understands the project domain. Btw. I'd put the processor into different class than the annotations, so it is not treated as part of the AridModel [[API]].
+
Nice. I am glad I could motivate someone who understands the project domain. Btw. I'd put the processor into different package than the annotations, so it is not treated as part of the AridModel [[API]]. It is an implementation detail, should be hidden to users of the [[API]] in some less public part of the [[API]] [[JAR]] file.
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 18:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 18:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:00, 31 August 2010

Comments on LiveDB <comments />


Russ White said ...

I was inspired by your article to create a project that would fit the needs I have for a project that requires integration with an existing schema.

http://github.com/AridModel

Thanks so much for your good article.

Cheers! Russ

--Russ White 15:43, 31 August 2010 (CEST)

Nice. I am glad I could motivate someone who understands the project domain. Btw. I'd put the processor into different package than the annotations, so it is not treated as part of the AridModel API. It is an implementation detail, should be hidden to users of the API in some less public part of the API JAR file.

--JaroslavTulach 18:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Russ White said ...

Thanks.

Do you mean that processor should be in a different package or project? I am just not clear on what you mean. I apologize.

Cheers! Russ

--Russ White 22:13, 31 August 2010 (CEST)

Personal tools
buy