Modular Java SE

From APIDesign

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: I like puzzles that tease my mind (a bit). Last week I've been introduced to one. Modularize JDK (a described at [http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/modular_java_platform Mark Reinhold's blog])...)
(java.applet and java.beans)
Line 7: Line 7:
== java.applet and java.beans ==
== java.applet and java.beans ==
-
Obviously you may be interested in using [[JavaBeans]] specification and you may not want to know anything about applets. Yet you may want to use applets and don't care about introspection and BeanInfos provided by [[JavaBeans]].
+
Obviously you may be interested in using [[JavaBean]]s specification and you may not want to know anything about applets. Also you may want to use applets and don't care about introspection and BeanInfos provided by [[JavaBean]]s. Is this possible?
 +
 
 +
Well, there is a problem. The ''java.beans.AppletInitializer'' interface. It resides in beans, yet its signature contains ''java.applet.Applet''. This means that the ''java.beans'' package has compile time dependency on ''java.applet''. Does that mean whoever uses [[JavaBean]]s module in future, needs to install applet module as well?
 +
 
 +
I hope no. Anybody knows a how to do it?
 +
 
 +
<comments/>

Revision as of 20:13, 14 June 2009

I like puzzles that tease my mind (a bit). Last week I've been introduced to one. Modularize JDK (a described at Mark Reinhold's blog). This page will capture my thoughts on this topic.

There can be many reasons for having modular JDK, but to simplify things, let's stick with one: we want to reach a point in future, when it will be enough to download just a limited set of JDK to execute an applet/application/server, etc.

The biggest obstacle that could prevent such goals is to define such limited pieces, make them independent and yet keep binary compatibility for the whole Java SE. Let's look at individual problems.

java.applet and java.beans

Obviously you may be interested in using JavaBeans specification and you may not want to know anything about applets. Also you may want to use applets and don't care about introspection and BeanInfos provided by JavaBeans. Is this possible?

Well, there is a problem. The java.beans.AppletInitializer interface. It resides in beans, yet its signature contains java.applet.Applet. This means that the java.beans package has compile time dependency on java.applet. Does that mean whoever uses JavaBeans module in future, needs to install applet module as well?

I hope no. Anybody knows a how to do it?

<comments/>

Personal tools
buy