JaroslavTulach at 18:59, 10 September 2014 - 2014-09-10 18:59:13

←Older revision Revision as of 18:59, 10 September 2014
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Recent "success" with introducing new [[bytecode]] - e.g. [[InvokeDynamic]] - seems to motivate people to come with more and more reasons why add new [[bytecode]]s. [[Value classes]] as proposed at https://blogs.oracle.com/jrose/entry/value_types_in_the_vm are one such approach.
+
Recent "success" with introducing new [[bytecode]] - e.g. [[InvokeDynamic]] - seems to motivate people to come with more and more reasons why add new [[bytecode]]s. [[Value classes]] as proposed at https://blogs.oracle.com/jrose/entry/value_types_in_the_vm are one such attempt.

JaroslavTulach: New page: Recent "success" with introducing new bytecode - e.g. InvokeDynamic - seems to motivate people to come with more and more reasons why add new bytecodes. Value classes as pr... - 2014-09-10 18:58:55

New page: Recent "success" with introducing new bytecode - e.g. InvokeDynamic - seems to motivate people to come with more and more reasons why add new bytecodes. Value classes as pr...

New page

Recent "success" with introducing new [[bytecode]] - e.g. [[InvokeDynamic]] - seems to motivate people to come with more and more reasons why add new [[bytecode]]s. [[Value classes]] as proposed at https://blogs.oracle.com/jrose/entry/value_types_in_the_vm are one such approach.