JaroslavTulach at 10:32, 27 September 2008 - 2008-09-27 10:32:19

←Older revision Revision as of 10:32, 27 September 2008
Line 2: Line 2:
Anonymous
Anonymous
 +
 +
From a physical point of view, diamonds are not only shining, but also very robust. I am quite sure that the robustness can be used to distinguish diamond from dust without any star light. However I see the poetic beauty of your note, so thanks for finding a way to marry both points of view.
 +
 +
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 10:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

79.116.250.237: New page: Nothing lasts forever, neither stars nor diamonds. While diamonds may last longer than a star, a diamond has no value without the light of a star. A diamond is no different than dirt in da... - 2008-09-27 07:08:00

New page: Nothing lasts forever, neither stars nor diamonds. While diamonds may last longer than a star, a diamond has no value without the light of a star. A diamond is no different than dirt in da...

New page

Nothing lasts forever, neither stars nor diamonds. While diamonds may last longer than a star, a diamond has no value without the light of a star. A diamond is no different than dirt in darkness. The beauty of a diamond is revealed by the light of a star. They should go hand in hand.

Anonymous