'. '

ChameleonBuilder

From APIDesign

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Unspecified Return Type)
(Unspecified Return Type)
Line 24: Line 24:
public final class Builder<R> {
public final class Builder<R> {
public R build() {
public R build() {
-
// construct Source
+
// construct Source, but is type to return R
 +
// throw error if essential attribute is missing
 +
return theSource;
}
}
public static Builder<Void> newFromText(String text) {
public static Builder<Void> newFromText(String text) {
-
// new one
+
// new instance of unfinished (because build method returns Void) builder
}
}

Revision as of 08:45, 16 June 2016

Very nice attribute of a Builder pattern is the fact that it allows the users to associate the attributes one by one and doesn't force them to do so in a predefined order. Possibly it allows the users to skip definition of some of the attributes and use defaults. However what can one do if certain attribute is essential - e.g. needs to be specified?

Factory Method

Of course, one can use a factory method - e.g. let the builder be created only with necessary attributes. However this has the typical drawbacks to evolution of factory methods - the order of parameters is important, needs to be remembered and potentially number of overloaded methods grows. We used to have fromText method in Source class. One would use it as:

Source src = Source.fromText("my.js", "my.js");

Now, can you guess what of the parameters is name for the Source and which of them is the content? Hardly, I don't remember the order either. Now imagine we add also a MIME type:

Source src = Source.fromText("my.js", "my.js", "text/javascript");

Three subsequent String arguments are really hard to use properly. Let's try to use the builder pattern, but make it unfinished first.

Unspecified Return Type

Let's signal to the user of your builder that it is not yet properly configured by returning wrong type from the build() method. The class could look like:

public final class Builder<R> {
  public R build() {
    // construct Source, but is type to return R
    // throw error if essential attribute is missing
    return theSource;
  }
 
  public static Builder<Void> newFromText(String text) {
    // new instance of unfinished (because build method returns Void) builder
  }
 
  public Builder<R> name(String name) {
    // assign the name
    return this;
  }
 
  public Builder<Source> mimeType(String mime) {
    // assign the name
    return (Builder<Source>)this;
  }
}

We parametrize the Builder with R - the return type of the build() method. Initially, when it is created the parameter is set to be Void - e.g. non-existing. One can call various non-essential configuration methods that don't change the state (like the name one) - those still return the same builder with the same type. If you try to use it as in following example, you'll get a compile time error:

Source src = Builder.newFromText("function hello() { print 'Hello'; }").
  name("hello.js").
  build(); // returns Void not Source!

Once the essential attribute mimeType is set, the same this is returned, but the system re-casts it to Builder<Source> - e.g. it indicates that the builder is now ready and can be used to create real final object:

Source src = Builder.newFromText("function hello() { print 'Hello'; }").
  name("hello.js").
  mimeType("text/javascript").
  build();

The type information is really compile time thing - e.g. it gets erased during execution. Thus the performance of this APIDesignPattern is the same of plain builder - but rather on relying on runtime exceptions saying something is missing - it co-operates with Javac to give the users early edit time/compile time error indications.

Personal tools
buy