92.224.244.230: Comment provided by Johannes W. - via ArticleComments extension

92.224.244.230 — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:01:26 GMT

Comment provided by Johannes W. - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 7 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do you feel about [[singleton]]s differently now?		Do you feel about [[singleton]]s differently now?
		+	== Johannes W. said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	Even though I prefer the DI style, I don't think DI is an option for an API (unless the API is some sort of runtime container).
		+	An API is usually called by the user, while the DI framework calls the user classes.
		+	Turning it the other way around and enforcing your DI impl on the user hurts in many ways.
		+
		+	Also using an injectable singleton the code stays slightly cleaner, since you can keep it's reference in any scope, while DI always makes everything a member variable (unless you perform work in a setter or constructor, which is against convention or complicates testing).
		+
		+	--Johannes W. 17:01, 7 December 2012 (CET)
		+	</div>

JaroslavTulach: New page: Do you feel about singletons differently now?

JaroslavTulach — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:54:30 GMT

New page: Do you feel about singletons differently now?

New page

Do you feel about [[singleton]]s differently now?