Talk:Reviewers:MartinRinardNotes - Revision history

Apidesign: Talk:Part 1 Overall Feedback moved to Talk:Reviewers:MartinRinardNotes

Apidesign — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:42:58 GMT

Talk:Part 1 Overall Feedback moved to Talk:Reviewers:MartinRinardNotes

←Older revision

Revision as of 21:42, 13 June 2008

JaroslavTulach at 08:15, 1 April 2008

JaroslavTulach — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:15:33 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:15, 1 April 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Re. '''a lot of examples''': I will do that, but not in the beginning. Examples without explanation are useless, although common, especially in empiricism/pragmatism. Rationalists need theory first. But there is the intro to the theory part that says, you can skip it, if you feel bored - I do not think I can do much more.		Re. '''a lot of examples''': I will do that, but not in the beginning. Examples without explanation are useless, although common, especially in empiricism/pragmatism. Rationalists need theory first. But there is the intro to the theory part that says, you can skip it, if you feel bored - I do not think I can do much more.
		+
		+	I've addressed this in '''2b70ddb6c1d2'''
		+

	Re. '''comfort zone vs. treatise''' - true, but I am not sure I'll be able to change that completely.		Re. '''comfort zone vs. treatise''' - true, but I am not sure I'll be able to change that completely.

Apidesign: New page: Re. '''target audience''': it should have been explained in the preface, everyone. However I do understand your comment and I am glad that you represent this point of view. That is exactly...

Apidesign — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:17:38 GMT

New page: Re. '''target audience''': it should have been explained in the preface, everyone. However I do understand your comment and I am glad that you represent this point of view. That is exactly...

New page

Re. '''target audience''': it should have been explained in the preface, everyone. However I do understand your comment and I am glad that you represent this point of view. That is exactly why I asked you to be the reviewer ;-)

Re. '''a lot of examples''': I will do that, but not in the beginning. Examples without explanation are useless, although common, especially in empiricism/pragmatism. Rationalists need theory first. But there is the intro to the theory part that says, you can skip it, if you feel bored - I do not think I can do much more.

Re. '''comfort zone vs. treatise''' - true, but I am not sure I'll be able to change that completely.