Talk:First Amoeba Video - Revision history

JaroslavTulach at 18:58, 23 August 2009

JaroslavTulach — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:58:09 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 23 August 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	--[http://netbeans.org Tim Boudreau] 19:49, 23 August 2009 (CEST)		--[http://netbeans.org Tim Boudreau] 19:49, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>
		+
		+	Thanks for asking your question, Tim. I am using [[wikipedia::ImageJ]]. It has '''AVI_Writer''' class and I am using it to create the ''.avi'' file from the '''BufferedImage'''s. Now I'd like to turn my toy into audio analyser, make the [[Amoeba]] ''dance'' to the rythm and produce '.avi' file with sound. The question is what tools to use to achieve all of this?
		+
		+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 18:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

72.79.223.147: Comment provided by Tim Boudreau - via ArticleComments extension

72.79.223.147 — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:49:21 GMT

Comment provided by Tim Boudreau - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 23 August 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:

	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
		+	== Tim Boudreau said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	What library are you using for AVI conversion?
		+
		+	--[http://netbeans.org Tim Boudreau] 19:49, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
		+	</div>

JaroslavTulach at 16:45, 23 August 2009

JaroslavTulach — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:45:11 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 23 August 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	<div class='commentBlock'>		<div class='commentBlock'>
-	Code ~~competion~~ with annotations is not big ~~aprovement~~. [[XML]] can have code ~~completition~~ too if we give [[XML Schema]] with it.	+	Code [[TheYearOfAnnotations2009\|completion with annotations]] is not big improvement. [[XML]] can have code completion too if we give [[XML Schema]] with it.

	--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)		--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
Line 19:		Line 19:
	</source>		</source>

-	Each [[Java]] IDE will offer only subclasses of '''JPanel''' when code completing value of myClass attribute. This cannot be done with plain [[XML Schema]] (as it is not aware of [[Java]] and its ~~classes~~ hierarchy).	+	Each [[Java]] IDE will offer only subclasses of '''JPanel''' when code completing value of myClass attribute. This cannot be done with plain [[XML Schema]] (as it is not aware of [[Java]] and its class hierarchy).

	Moreover it looks more handy for majority of users (I have talked to) to edit just one language than switch from a [[Java]] file to an [[XML]] file and back. I think there is significant benefit of annotations over the [[XML]] and its [[XML Schema\|schema]] (mixed with [[Java]]).		Moreover it looks more handy for majority of users (I have talked to) to edit just one language than switch from a [[Java]] file to an [[XML]] file and back. I think there is significant benefit of annotations over the [[XML]] and its [[XML Schema\|schema]] (mixed with [[Java]]).

	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

JaroslavTulach at 16:39, 23 August 2009

JaroslavTulach — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:39:37 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 23 August 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	<div class='commentBlock'>		<div class='commentBlock'>
-	Code competion with annotations is not big aprovement. XML can have code completition too if we give XML Schema with it.	+	Code competion with annotations is not big aprovement. [[XML]] can have code completition too if we give [[XML Schema]] with it.

	--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)		--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>
		+
		+	True, [[XML]] has structure and there can be a completion, but [[annotations]] make it more easier and are more integrated with [[Java]]. Imagine:
		+
		+	<source lang="java">
		+	public @interface ReferenceToJPanel {
		+	Class<? extends JPanel> myClass();
		+	}
		+	</source>
		+
		+	Each [[Java]] IDE will offer only subclasses of '''JPanel''' when code completing value of myClass attribute. This cannot be done with plain [[XML Schema]] (as it is not aware of [[Java]] and its classes hierarchy).
		+
		+	Moreover it looks more handy for majority of users (I have talked to) to edit just one language than switch from a [[Java]] file to an [[XML]] file and back. I think there is significant benefit of annotations over the [[XML]] and its [[XML Schema\|schema]] (mixed with [[Java]]).
		+
		+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

188.112.127.121: Comment provided by Payne - via ArticleComments extension

188.112.127.121 — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:14:15 GMT

Comment provided by Payne - via ArticleComments extension

New page

<noinclude>Comments on [[First Amoeba Video]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Payne said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Code competion with annotations is not big aprovement. XML can have code completition too if we give XML Schema with it.

--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
</div>