<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://wiki.apidesign.org/skins/common/feed.css?116"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Talk:End Of Life Procedures - Revision history</title>
		<link>http://wiki.apidesign.org/index.php?title=Talk:End_Of_Life_Procedures&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.12.0rc1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 01:45:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>Apidesign: New page: This section is good, and reminiscent of (symmetric to?) your section at the beginning of Part 3, &quot;An API Must ...&quot;.  One thing I would recommend: an additional section of this chapter abo...</title>
			<link>http://wiki.apidesign.org/index.php?title=Talk:End_Of_Life_Procedures&amp;diff=956&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;New page: This section is good, and reminiscent of (symmetric to?) your section at the beginning of Part 3, &amp;quot;An API Must ...&amp;quot;.  One thing I would recommend: an additional section of this chapter abo...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This section is good, and reminiscent of (symmetric to?) your section at the beginning of Part 3, &amp;quot;An API Must ...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing I would recommend: an additional section of this chapter about communicating and distributing one's API.  In my experience, a number of people have developed APIs which may be either good or bad, but which I have little chance of knowing, because it's presented so badly as to discourage me from investigating further, thereby rendering all of the work that went into the API somewhat useless.  I know this isn't purely a software thing, but I think communicating an API clearly - what it does, what its limitations are, how it works!!! - is very important.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dmkoelle|Dmkoelle]] 02:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;... but also whole packages like java.beans.beancontext that are there without any further reason.&amp;quot;  Why?  This package has not been deprecated AFAIK and it may still be quite useful to some.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:TomWheeler|TomWheeler]] Wed Apr 23 20:38:48 CDT 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
what is &amp;quot;paste jewelry&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Richunger|Richunger]] 05:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Done: 646c80dd9887'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;it is enough to specify a trigger ModuleAutoDeps&amp;quot;: probably incomprehensible for non-NetBeans developers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AndreiBadea|AndreiBadea]] 13:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;TopManager&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; example it would perhaps make sense to mention that you want to remove &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;TopManager&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AndreiBadea|AndreiBadea]] 13:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The section on bytecode patching doesn't add anything here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was looking for more from this section.  The example of TopManager &lt;br /&gt;
delegating to ExecutionEngine.getDefault() seems pretty obvious, but I am interested &lt;br /&gt;
in how you disentangled, say, MDR from the editor APIs.  How do you identify &lt;br /&gt;
segments of a large block of code that should be separated out into a module, and &lt;br /&gt;
what methodology do you use to pull the strands apart and &amp;quot;API-ify&amp;quot; it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Richunger|Richunger]] 05:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:36:28 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Apidesign</dc:creator>			<comments>http://wiki.apidesign.org/wiki/Talk:End_Of_Life_Procedures</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>