Talk:Closures - Revision history

94.23.238.222: Comment provided by Sabrina - via ArticleComments extension

94.23.238.222 — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:22:16 GMT

Comment provided by Sabrina - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 26 June 2013
Line 858:		Line 858:

	--Mai 16:49, 26 June 2013 (CEST)		--Mai 16:49, 26 June 2013 (CEST)
		+	</div>
		+	== Sabrina said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	I have been previously rednaig out a number of your site content i can state pretty clever stuff. Let me be sure to bookmark your blog site.
		+
		+	--Sabrina 21:22, 26 June 2013 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

94.23.238.222: Comment provided by Mai - via ArticleComments extension

94.23.238.222 — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:49:46 GMT

Comment provided by Mai - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 26 June 2013
Line 851:		Line 851:

	--Tato 16:12, 26 June 2013 (CEST)		--Tato 16:12, 26 June 2013 (CEST)
		+	</div>
		+	== Mai said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	You could certainly see your estxrpiee in the paintings you write. The sector hopes for even more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to mention how they believe. All the time follow your heart.
		+
		+	--Mai 16:49, 26 June 2013 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

94.23.238.222: Comment provided by Tato - via ArticleComments extension

94.23.238.222 — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:12:06 GMT

Comment provided by Tato - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 26 June 2013
Line 844:		Line 844:

	--Murad 02:58, 26 June 2013 (CEST)		--Murad 02:58, 26 June 2013 (CEST)
		+	</div>
		+	== Tato said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	It just occurred to me that if you want to eliimnate the bias (happening when there is more than one line with the minimal random value) by using the iterative process I described above, you can actually do that in one pass over the file.Instead of keeping 1 line and 1 number (the minimum so far) in memory, keep 1 line and an array of numbers in memory. The length of the array is the maximum number of iterations, it can also be an unbounded linked list. Don't expect many iterations to be necessary, especially if RAND_MAX is big.So, when random() returns the same value as the minimal value so far, call random() twice again. Store the minimum of the two values in the second item of the array. If the first call returns the smallest of the two values, keep the old line. If the second call returns the smallest of the two values, keep the new one. If both are the same, call random() twice again, and store it in the third value of the array. And so on.For later lines, continue to compare the random() return value with the first item in the array first. When it is smaller, keep that line and drop all the further values in the array.
		+
		+	--Tato 16:12, 26 June 2013 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

94.23.238.222: Comment provided by Murad - via ArticleComments extension

94.23.238.222 — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:58:53 GMT

Comment provided by Murad - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 26 June 2013
Line 837:		Line 837:

	--Jale 23:40, 25 June 2013 (CEST)		--Jale 23:40, 25 June 2013 (CEST)
		+	</div>
		+	== Murad said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	You could certainly see your exteprise in the paintings you write. The sector hopes for even more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to mention how they believe. All the time follow your heart.
		+
		+	--Murad 02:58, 26 June 2013 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

94.23.238.222: Comment provided by Jale - via ArticleComments extension

94.23.238.222 — Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:40:32 GMT

Comment provided by Jale - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 25 June 2013
Line 830:		Line 830:

	--Anthito 21:13, 25 June 2013 (CEST)		--Anthito 21:13, 25 June 2013 (CEST)
		+	</div>
		+	== Jale said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	I am distressed by the aprnepat double speak' on the constant rip up of Anthony Henday Drive just short years after a massive construction time span. It was promised that the added expense and time required to pour concrete when being built would provide 20 years of maintenance free roadway. Here we are 6-7 years later, the road is being jack-hammered up, the explanation via media soundbites that no, this is simply scheduled maintenance. I can deal with the construction much easier if I felt I wasn't being manipulated, or lied to. Here's another last year on 87 Avenue, a lot of work went into building a whole new roadway with added lanes on the stretch in front of the Misericordia Hospital. We all were dodging cones and barricades for months. Before the painted lines on the asphalt were dry, the new asphalt was being torn up to install concrete pads for bus stops. Why can't the work be coordinated? Or designed properly? Where is the accountability? Good for you for asking for some straight answers. Simpy put: City of Edmonton Transportation has exhausted the good-will of Edmontonians. They need to be concerned about that.
		+
		+	--Jale 23:40, 25 June 2013 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

94.23.238.222: Comment provided by Anthito - via ArticleComments extension

94.23.238.222 — Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:13:39 GMT

Comment provided by Anthito - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 25 June 2013
Line 823:		Line 823:

	--[http://reversephonelookupcellnumbers.blogspot.com/ Francesco] 06:34, 22 July 2012 (CEST)		--[http://reversephonelookupcellnumbers.blogspot.com/ Francesco] 06:34, 22 July 2012 (CEST)
		+	</div>
		+	== Anthito said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	Closing 17th street (from Whitemud to Anthony Henday) last year and again this year (until November) is relaly frustrating. It leaves me with only 2 roads in and out of my house, with major extra mileage if I have to go east or north. It forces me to go through 2 residential neighbourhoods every day to get to work. I don't like going through there, just as much as I'm sure the residents don't like the extra traffic.Speaking of extra traffic, the 17th street construction has forced all the traffic go past my house on Silver Berry Road. Imagine trying to back out of your driveway onto a freeway, and you'll see our problem. Sometimes, I'll wait for 25 cars to pass before I can back out. It's a 50kmph zone, but we call it the Silver Berry Speedway. Cars regularly go past our house at speeds up to 100 kmph, especially in the evening. I've had numerous times where no one was coming, so I back out, and some moron comes around the blind curve doing 100kmph and just about creams me. And they blow their horns at ME!I've complained to the police so many times they won't even return my calls anymore. The only thing they'll do is put out one of those fully-decalled community vans to do photo radar. It only slows the traffic down where the van is, because everybody knows what it is.
		+
		+	--Anthito 21:13, 25 June 2013 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

176.9.172.132: Comment provided by Francesco - via ArticleComments extension

176.9.172.132 — Sun, 22 Jul 2012 04:34:54 GMT

Comment provided by Francesco - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:34, 22 July 2012
Line 814:		Line 814:

	Jeffrey D. Smith		Jeffrey D. Smith
		+	== Francesco said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	I thought it was going to be some boring old site,
		+	but Im glad I visited. I will post a link to this page on my blog.
		+
		+	I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.
		+
		+	--[http://reversephonelookupcellnumbers.blogspot.com/ Francesco] 06:34, 22 July 2012 (CEST)
		+	</div>

66.47.27.36: /* Practical Example */

66.47.27.36 — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:40:03 GMT

Practical Example

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 12 February 2010
Line 668:		Line 668:
	to Move. Feel free to remove this comment, if not appripriate.		to Move. Feel free to remove this comment, if not appripriate.
	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 05:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 05:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	My own design paradigm regarding the Enum class is NOT to put additional
		+	behavior into the Enum, which would reduce it's flexibility and applicability
		+	in other contexts. I use the paradigm of array indexing via the Enum ordinal
		+	to allow for unlimited future behavior without needing to re-open the Enum class
		+	to add more code. Re-opening the Enum class exposes vulnerability to backward
		+	incompatibility. The Enum class simply associates a number to a semantic meaning.
		+	The behavior for each Enum member is always provided elsewhere, and there is no
		+	limit to the number of new behaviors that can be defined without breaking the
		+	backward compatibility. I understand that there are situations where the designer
		+	knows with absolute certainty that there will be no future extensions to the
		+	behavior required of the Enum class, and so it is safe to put that behavior
		+	directly into the Enum class. I think those situations are the rarity, rather
		+	than the normal case.
		+	Jeffrey D. Smith
		+	--[[Special:Contributions/66.47.27.36\|66.47.27.36]] 18:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

	At this point, most of the LinkListClosure is implemented in a		At this point, most of the LinkListClosure is implemented in a

JaroslavTulach: /* Practical Example */

JaroslavTulach — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:21:09 GMT

Practical Example

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:21, 10 February 2010
Line 662:		Line 662:
	}		}
	</source>		</source>
		+
		+	I would suggest to move the Move methods directly into Movement enumeration
		+	(making them package private). Whenever you use Move, you would pass Movement.
		+	This way the example would be shorter and you would safe the mapping from Movement
		+	to Move. Feel free to remove this comment, if not appripriate.
		+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 05:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

	At this point, most of the LinkListClosure is implemented in a		At this point, most of the LinkListClosure is implemented in a
Line 672:		Line 678:
	<source lang='java'>		<source lang='java'>
	/* My row selection. */		/* My row selection. */
-	public ~~Enum~~ Animal	+	public enum Animal
	{		{
	/* Select the CAT row. */		/* Select the CAT row. */
Line 682:		Line 688:

	/* My column selection. */		/* My column selection. */
-	public ~~Enum~~ Fruit	+	public enum Fruit
	{		{
	/* Select the APPLE column. */		/* Select the APPLE column. */

JaroslavTulach: /* Practical Example */

JaroslavTulach — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:15:22 GMT

Practical Example

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 10 February 2010
Line 418:		Line 418:
	* implementations.		* implementations.
	*/		*/
-	public ~~Enum~~ Movement	+	public enum Movement
	{		{
	/* Move the Node forward (towards the head) in its list. */		/* Move the Node forward (towards the head) in its list. */