Talk:Bugzilla - Revision history

118.99.64.100: Comment provided by Pamela - via ArticleComments extension

118.99.64.100 — Wed, 23 May 2012 13:52:10 GMT

Comment provided by Pamela - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 23 May 2012
Line 26:		Line 26:

	--Elliptical Review 21:27, 16 December 2011 (CET)		--Elliptical Review 21:27, 16 December 2011 (CET)
		+	</div>
		+	== Pamela said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	I think the admin of this website is genuinely working hard in support of his website, since here
		+	every information is quality based material.
		+
		+	--[http://www.i-pod-repairs.co.uk Pamela] 15:52, 23 May 2012 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

Apidesign: Was this link a spam?

Apidesign — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:34:49 GMT

Was this link a spam?

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 21 December 2011
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Strongly suggest adding a "google+" button for the blog!		Strongly suggest adding a "google+" button for the blog!

-	--~~[http://www.bestellipticalreviews.org/~~ Elliptical Review] 21:27, 16 December 2011 (CET)	+	--Elliptical Review 21:27, 16 December 2011 (CET)
	</div>		</div>

109.230.216.20: Comment provided by Elliptical Review - via ArticleComments extension

109.230.216.20 — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:27:04 GMT

Comment provided by Elliptical Review - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 16 December 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:

	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 07:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 07:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
		+	== Elliptical Review said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	Strongly suggest adding a "google+" button for the blog!
		+
		+	--[http://www.bestellipticalreviews.org/ Elliptical Review] 21:27, 16 December 2011 (CET)
		+	</div>

JaroslavTulach at 07:18, 22 October 2010

JaroslavTulach — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:18:01 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 22 October 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	--cug 17:13, 21 October 2010 (CEST)		--cug 17:13, 21 October 2010 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>
		+
		+	Hi. I know people say that [[netbeans:WorkingWithNetBeansSources\|working with NetBeans sources]] is hard. But it is always tough to figure out what is the actual problem. Your OutOfMemory problem could be sign of missing ''export ANT_OPTS="-Xmx256m -XX:MaxPermSize=96m"'', but who knows for sure? If you are willing to give it one more try follow [[netbeans:WorkingWithNetBeansSources]] and if you hit a wall let me know, where. I'll try to help you out of the misery.
		+
		+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 07:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

194.76.29.2: Comment provided by cug - via ArticleComments extension

194.76.29.2 — Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:13:31 GMT

Comment provided by cug - via ArticleComments extension

New page

<noinclude>Comments on [[Bugzilla]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== cug said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
I'm a netbeans user for 3 years now. I want to be more than a take-all-and-give-nothing-back user. I even tried once (only once though). I downloaded the sources and tried to build netbeans from sources.
The way I did it must have been wrong. I built all, OutOfMemory every now and then during a week. Gave up pretty quick. Weak user.
To have users like me contribute means that an expert spend time advising and reviewing my changesets. During this time he could actually solve N-fold more bugs. And that effort MAY be worth it, most probably won't.
Basically, if there more than one like me, community contribution is meant to be a failure.
What I would do to get over being a failure: If an expert is willing to tutor me and help me become a netbeans contributor, when I'm doing well I will tutor two other new-comers.
It's not what I think the netbeans team should do, it's what I would do.
Throwing links at me is not considered tutoring. Throwing links and listening, correcting and suggesting work packages to me is.

--cug 17:13, 21 October 2010 (CEST)
</div>