JaroslavTulach at 09:41, 15 September 2008

JaroslavTulach — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:41:49 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 15 September 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:

	best regards,		best regards,
-	josh.	+	josh.

	--[http://www.sepix.de/blogs/blogrittner/index.html Aljoscha Rittner] 08:35, 15 September 2008 (CEST)		--[http://www.sepix.de/blogs/blogrittner/index.html Aljoscha Rittner] 08:35, 15 September 2008 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>
		+
		+	One can always use getStackTrace/setStackTrace methods on an exception to adjust the stacktrace, but indeed, that means everything is getting more complicated.
		+
		+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 09:41, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

80.128.113.214: Comment provided by Aljoscha Rittner - via ArticleComments extension

80.128.113.214 — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:35:35 GMT

Comment provided by Aljoscha Rittner - via ArticleComments extension

New page

<noinclude>Comments on [[APIDesignPatterns:Exceptions]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Aljoscha Rittner said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
"On the other hand, Chapter 5 also advices to prefer factory methods over exposing constructors. I tried that few times, but I have a feeling that this feels a bit unnatural and as such I cannot recommend code like: " [...factory sample...]

It's not only unnatural, a static factory hides the real exception point into the stacktrace.

best regards,
josh.

--[http://www.sepix.de/blogs/blogrittner/index.html Aljoscha Rittner] 08:35, 15 September 2008 (CEST)
</div>

Talk:APIDesignPatterns:Exceptions - Revision history

JaroslavTulach at 09:41, 15 September 2008

80.128.113.214: Comment provided by Aljoscha Rittner - via ArticleComments extension