<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://wiki.apidesign.org/skins/common/feed.css?116"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>PackagePrivateTypes - Revision history</title>
		<link>http://wiki.apidesign.org/index.php?title=PackagePrivateTypes&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.12.0rc1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:10:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>JaroslavTulach: New page: Some people believe it is OK and useful to expose package private classes. I found such attitude weird as there is always a way to avoid it as my rewrite of betting API shows: https://gith...</title>
			<link>http://wiki.apidesign.org/index.php?title=PackagePrivateTypes&amp;diff=7566&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;New page: Some people believe it is OK and useful to expose package private classes. I found such attitude weird as there is always a way to avoid it as my rewrite of betting API shows: https://gith...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Some people believe it is OK and useful to expose package private classes. I found such attitude weird as there is always a way to avoid it as my rewrite of betting API shows: https://github.com/jtulach/BettingExample/commit/0dca650b579471a2ee73edd61161f0d31931761e&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:APIDesignPatterns:Anti]]&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:22:57 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>JaroslavTulach</dc:creator>			<comments>http://wiki.apidesign.org/wiki/Talk:PackagePrivateTypes</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>