Good - Revision history

JaroslavTulach at 05:55, 20 October 2018

JaroslavTulach — Sat, 20 Oct 2018 05:55:22 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:55, 20 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	When looking at a technology and deciding whether it is a [[Good Technology]] there are two angles. Internal and external. An external end user recognizes [[Good technology]] by three key aspects - [[Time To Market]], [[Cost of Ownership]] and [[~~coolness~~]]. Internally we often prefer to talk about [[quality]] and various ways to measure it. At the end both of these views are important. Continue reading at [[Good Technology]] and then make sure to familiarize with the [[Amoeba]] model.	+	When looking at a technology and deciding whether it is a [[Good Technology]] there are two angles. Internal and external. An external end user recognizes [[Good technology]] by three key aspects - [[Time To Market]], [[Cost of Ownership]] and [[Coolness]]. Internally we often prefer to talk about [[quality]] and various ways to measure it. At the end both of these views are important. Continue reading at [[Good Technology]] and then make sure to familiarize with the [[Amoeba]] model.

JaroslavTulach — Sat, 20 Oct 2018 05:55:06 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:55, 20 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	When looking at a technology and deciding whether it is a [[Good Technology]] there are two angles. Internal and external. An external end user recognizes [[Good technology]] three key aspects. Internally we often prefer to talk about [[quality]]. At the end both of these views are important. Continue reading at [[Good Technology]] and then make sure to ~~understand~~ the [[Amoeba]] model.	+	When looking at a technology and deciding whether it is a [[Good Technology]] there are two angles. Internal and external. An external end user recognizes [[Good technology]] by three key aspects - [[Time To Market]], [[Cost of Ownership]] and [[coolness]]. Internally we often prefer to talk about [[quality]] and various ways to measure it. At the end both of these views are important. Continue reading at [[Good Technology]] and then make sure to familiarize with the [[Amoeba]] model.

JaroslavTulach — Sat, 20 Oct 2018 05:49:41 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:49, 20 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	When looking at a technology and deciding whether it is [[Good Technology]] there are two angles. Internal and external. An external end user recognizes [[Good technology]] three key aspects. Internally we often prefer to talk about [[quality]]. At the end both of these views are important. Continue reading at [[Good Technology]] and then make sure to understand the [[Amoeba]] model.	+	When looking at a technology and deciding whether it is a [[Good Technology]] there are two angles. Internal and external. An external end user recognizes [[Good technology]] three key aspects. Internally we often prefer to talk about [[quality]]. At the end both of these views are important. Continue reading at [[Good Technology]] and then make sure to understand the [[Amoeba]] model.

JaroslavTulach — Sat, 20 Oct 2018 05:49:29 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:49, 20 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~#REDIRECT~~ [[Good Technology]]	+	When looking at a technology and deciding whether it is [[Good Technology]] there are two angles. Internal and external. An external end user recognizes [[Good technology]] three key aspects. Internally we often prefer to talk about [[quality]]. At the end both of these views are important. Continue reading at [[Good Technology]] and then make sure to understand the [[Amoeba]] model.

JaroslavTulach — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:53:53 GMT

New page

#REDIRECT [[Good Technology]]