Errata 9 - Revision history

JaroslavTulach: /* Page 154 */

JaroslavTulach — Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:49:43 GMT

Page 154

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:49, 11 February 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[Yoshiki]] wanted me to clarify meaning of ''that'', ''the'', ''this'' in the following paragraph. So here is the rephrased version (text is '''bold''' is changed compared to original used in [[TheAPIBook]]):		[[Yoshiki]] wanted me to clarify meaning of ''that'', ''the'', ''this'' in the following paragraph. So here is the rephrased version (text is '''bold''' is changed compared to original used in [[TheAPIBook]]):

-	Measuring the [[Cost of Ownership]] isn’t '''your''' primary focus when you want to find out why you don’t have as many developers using your library as you would like. It might be reasonable to analyze '''the cost of ownership''', if you used to have developers and are now losing them. However, if you’re just starting and you need to attract new ones, '''the cost of ownership''' is probably not the most important criterion to use. '''People may trust your library more''' if you have a good reputation with respect to [[BackwardCompatibility]] (which reduces the cost of ownership). However '''optimizing the [[Cost of Ownership]] may''' not '''your''' primary concern when you need to optimize for [[Time To Market]].	+	Measuring the [[Cost of Ownership]] isn’t '''your''' primary focus when you want to find out why you don’t have as many developers using your library as you would like. It might be reasonable to analyze '''the cost of ownership''', if you used to have developers and are now losing them. However, if you’re just starting and you need to attract new ones, '''the cost of ownership''' is probably not the most important criterion to use. '''People may trust your library more''' if you have a good reputation with respect to [[BackwardCompatibility]] (which reduces the cost of ownership). However '''optimizing the [[Cost of Ownership]] may''' not be '''your''' primary concern when you need to optimize for [[Time To Market]].

JaroslavTulach: /* Page 154 */

JaroslavTulach — Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:48:30 GMT

Page 154

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 11 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===== [[Errata 9\|Page 154]] =====		===== [[Errata 9\|Page 154]] =====

-	[[Yoshiki]] wanted me to clarify meaning of ''that'', ''the'', ''this'' in the following paragraph. So here is the rephrased version:	+	[[Yoshiki]] wanted me to clarify meaning of ''that'', ''the'', ''this'' in the following paragraph. So here is the rephrased version (text is '''bold''' is changed compared to original used in [[TheAPIBook]]):

	Measuring the [[Cost of Ownership]] isn’t '''your''' primary focus when you want to find out why you don’t have as many developers using your library as you would like. It might be reasonable to analyze '''the cost of ownership''', if you used to have developers and are now losing them. However, if you’re just starting and you need to attract new ones, '''the cost of ownership''' is probably not the most important criterion to use. '''People may trust your library more''' if you have a good reputation with respect to [[BackwardCompatibility]] (which reduces the cost of ownership). However '''optimizing the [[Cost of Ownership]] may''' not '''your''' primary concern when you need to optimize for [[Time To Market]].		Measuring the [[Cost of Ownership]] isn’t '''your''' primary focus when you want to find out why you don’t have as many developers using your library as you would like. It might be reasonable to analyze '''the cost of ownership''', if you used to have developers and are now losing them. However, if you’re just starting and you need to attract new ones, '''the cost of ownership''' is probably not the most important criterion to use. '''People may trust your library more''' if you have a good reputation with respect to [[BackwardCompatibility]] (which reduces the cost of ownership). However '''optimizing the [[Cost of Ownership]] may''' not '''your''' primary concern when you need to optimize for [[Time To Market]].

JaroslavTulach: /* Page 154 */

JaroslavTulach — Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:47:46 GMT

Page 154

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 11 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===== [[Errata 9\|Page 154]] =====		===== [[Errata 9\|Page 154]] =====

-	[[Yoshiki]] wanted to to clarify meaning of ''that'', ''the'', ''this'' in the following paragraph. So here is the rephrased version:	+	[[Yoshiki]] wanted me to clarify meaning of ''that'', ''the'', ''this'' in the following paragraph. So here is the rephrased version:

	Measuring the [[Cost of Ownership]] isn’t '''your''' primary focus when you want to find out why you don’t have as many developers using your library as you would like. It might be reasonable to analyze '''the cost of ownership''', if you used to have developers and are now losing them. However, if you’re just starting and you need to attract new ones, '''the cost of ownership''' is probably not the most important criterion to use. '''People may trust your library more''' if you have a good reputation with respect to [[BackwardCompatibility]] (which reduces the cost of ownership). However '''optimizing the [[Cost of Ownership]] may''' not '''your''' primary concern when you need to optimize for [[Time To Market]].		Measuring the [[Cost of Ownership]] isn’t '''your''' primary focus when you want to find out why you don’t have as many developers using your library as you would like. It might be reasonable to analyze '''the cost of ownership''', if you used to have developers and are now losing them. However, if you’re just starting and you need to attract new ones, '''the cost of ownership''' is probably not the most important criterion to use. '''People may trust your library more''' if you have a good reputation with respect to [[BackwardCompatibility]] (which reduces the cost of ownership). However '''optimizing the [[Cost of Ownership]] may''' not '''your''' primary concern when you need to optimize for [[Time To Market]].

JaroslavTulach at 10:47, 11 February 2014

JaroslavTulach — Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:47:33 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 11 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~Nothing yet. Maybe a~~ [[~~Chapter~~ 9\|~~perfect chapter~~]]?	+	===== [[Errata 9\|Page 154]] =====
		+
		+	[[Yoshiki]] wanted to to clarify meaning of ''that'', ''the'', ''this'' in the following paragraph. So here is the rephrased version:
		+
		+	Measuring the [[Cost of Ownership]] isn’t '''your''' primary focus when you want to find out why you don’t have as many developers using your library as you would like. It might be reasonable to analyze '''the cost of ownership''', if you used to have developers and are now losing them. However, if you’re just starting and you need to attract new ones, '''the cost of ownership''' is probably not the most important criterion to use. '''People may trust your library more''' if you have a good reputation with respect to [[BackwardCompatibility]] (which reduces the cost of ownership). However '''optimizing the [[Cost of Ownership]] may''' not '''your''' primary concern when you need to optimize for [[Time To Market]].

JaroslavTulach: New page: Nothing yet. Maybe a perfect chapter?

JaroslavTulach — Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:31:01 GMT

New page: Nothing yet. Maybe a perfect chapter?

New page

Nothing yet. Maybe a [[Chapter 9|perfect chapter]]?