Comment provided by Moefti - via ArticleComments extension
| ←Older revision | Revision as of 03:08, 22 October 2013 | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
--Deros 04:49, 22 October 2013 (CEST) | --Deros 04:49, 22 October 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Moefti said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | Hi, Cedric.From my point of view I cannot say much about Mercurial beacsue I have never used it but from the video it sounds very similar to Darcs and this I know is 100 times better than Subversion, especially for distributed development. Subversion to me seems as a CVS without the bugs . It overcomes a lot of shortcomings of CVS but still has the same old philosophy that you have one large centralized repository and merging happens always in a linear fashion.The notion of change sets (or patches) as it is put forward by Darcs makes in my opinion much more sense in distributed development team. Everybody can apply everybody else's changes any time without having to worry about conflicts whatsoever. What else does one want?The only problem I see with Darcs is still the lack of good tooling, especially for Eclipse (there is a plugin but it's not too useful right now).Eric | ||
| + | |||
| + | --Moefti 05:08, 22 October 2013 (CEST) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||