JaroslavTulach at 18:58, 23 August 2009 - 2009-08-23 18:58:09

←Older revision Revision as of 18:58, 23 August 2009
Line 31: Line 31:
--[http://netbeans.org Tim Boudreau] 19:49, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
--[http://netbeans.org Tim Boudreau] 19:49, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
</div>
</div>
 +
 +
Thanks for asking your question, Tim. I am using [[wikipedia::ImageJ]]. It has '''AVI_Writer''' class and I am using it to create the ''.avi'' file from the '''BufferedImage'''s. Now I'd like to turn my toy into audio analyser, make the [[Amoeba]] ''dance'' to the rythm and produce '.avi' file with sound. The question is what tools to use to achieve all of this?
 +
 +
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 18:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

72.79.223.147: Comment provided by Tim Boudreau - via ArticleComments extension - 2009-08-23 17:49:21

Comment provided by Tim Boudreau - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision Revision as of 17:49, 23 August 2009
Line 24: Line 24:
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 +
== Tim Boudreau said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
What library are you using for AVI conversion?
 +
 +
--[http://netbeans.org Tim Boudreau] 19:49, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
 +
</div>

JaroslavTulach at 16:45, 23 August 2009 - 2009-08-23 16:45:11

←Older revision Revision as of 16:45, 23 August 2009
Line 6: Line 6:
<div class='commentBlock'>
<div class='commentBlock'>
-
Code competion with annotations is not big aprovement. [[XML]] can have code completition too if we give [[XML Schema]] with it.
+
Code [[TheYearOfAnnotations2009|completion with annotations]] is not big improvement. [[XML]] can have code completion too if we give [[XML Schema]] with it.
--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
Line 19: Line 19:
</source>
</source>
-
Each [[Java]] IDE will offer only subclasses of '''JPanel''' when code completing value of myClass attribute. This cannot be done with plain [[XML Schema]] (as it is not aware of [[Java]] and its classes hierarchy).
+
Each [[Java]] IDE will offer only subclasses of '''JPanel''' when code completing value of myClass attribute. This cannot be done with plain [[XML Schema]] (as it is not aware of [[Java]] and its class hierarchy).
Moreover it looks more handy for majority of users (I have talked to) to edit just one language than switch from a [[Java]] file to an [[XML]] file and back. I think there is significant benefit of annotations over the [[XML]] and its [[XML Schema|schema]] (mixed with [[Java]]).
Moreover it looks more handy for majority of users (I have talked to) to edit just one language than switch from a [[Java]] file to an [[XML]] file and back. I think there is significant benefit of annotations over the [[XML]] and its [[XML Schema|schema]] (mixed with [[Java]]).
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

JaroslavTulach at 16:39, 23 August 2009 - 2009-08-23 16:39:37

←Older revision Revision as of 16:39, 23 August 2009
Line 6: Line 6:
<div class='commentBlock'>
<div class='commentBlock'>
-
Code competion with annotations is not big aprovement. XML can have code completition too if we give XML Schema with it.
+
Code competion with annotations is not big aprovement. [[XML]] can have code completition too if we give [[XML Schema]] with it.
--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
</div>
</div>
 +
 +
True, [[XML]] has structure and there can be a completion, but [[annotations]] make it more easier and are more integrated with [[Java]]. Imagine:
 +
 +
<source lang="java">
 +
public @interface ReferenceToJPanel {
 +
Class<? extends JPanel> myClass();
 +
}
 +
</source>
 +
 +
Each [[Java]] IDE will offer only subclasses of '''JPanel''' when code completing value of myClass attribute. This cannot be done with plain [[XML Schema]] (as it is not aware of [[Java]] and its classes hierarchy).
 +
 +
Moreover it looks more handy for majority of users (I have talked to) to edit just one language than switch from a [[Java]] file to an [[XML]] file and back. I think there is significant benefit of annotations over the [[XML]] and its [[XML Schema|schema]] (mixed with [[Java]]).
 +
 +
--[[User:JaroslavTulach|JaroslavTulach]] 16:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

188.112.127.121: Comment provided by Payne - via ArticleComments extension - 2009-08-23 15:14:15

Comment provided by Payne - via ArticleComments extension

New page

<noinclude>Comments on [[First Amoeba Video]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Payne said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Code competion with annotations is not big aprovement. XML can have code completition too if we give XML Schema with it.

--Payne 17:14, 23 August 2009 (CEST)
</div>