Talk:Modular Java SE - Revision history

216.244.87.170: Comment provided by pggjuxwyemyh - via ArticleComments extension

2013-10-18T15:24:10Z

Comment provided by pggjuxwyemyh - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, 18 October 2013
Line 51:		Line 51:

	--[http://reversephonelookupcellnumbers.blogspot.com/ Latanya] 18:32, 27 July 2012 (CEST)		--[http://reversephonelookupcellnumbers.blogspot.com/ Latanya] 18:32, 27 July 2012 (CEST)
		+	</div>
		+	== pggjuxwyemyh said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	OOONNNNYYYYTTTTIIIII
		+
		+	--pggjuxwyemyh 17:24, 18 October 2013 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

176.9.172.144: Comment provided by Latanya - via ArticleComments extension

2012-07-27T16:32:15Z

Comment provided by Latanya - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 27 July 2012
Line 44:		Line 44:
	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 13:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 13:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

		+	</div>
		+	== Latanya said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	well, i would say that infertility can be a thing of the past because of modern advancements in medicine“
		+
		+	--[http://reversephonelookupcellnumbers.blogspot.com/ Latanya] 18:32, 27 July 2012 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

JaroslavTulach at 13:48, 26 June 2009

2009-06-26T13:48:09Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 26 June 2009
Line 40:		Line 40:
	--Ivan 13:22, 26 June 2009 (CEST)		--Ivan 13:22, 26 June 2009 (CEST)

-	If you are interested, then let's improve the instructions on how to build the system. Can you build the monolithic [[OpenJDK]] using its original make files?	+	If you are interested, then let's improve the instructions on how to build the system. Can you build the monolithic [[OpenJDK]] using its original make files? Btw. I've just updated the steps and this time really followed them, so chances are higher someone can succeed reproducing them.

-	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 12:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)	+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 13:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

	</div>		</div>

JaroslavTulach at 12:15, 26 June 2009

2009-06-26T12:15:47Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 26 June 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:

	--Ivan 13:22, 26 June 2009 (CEST)		--Ivan 13:22, 26 June 2009 (CEST)
		+
		+	If you are interested, then let's improve the instructions on how to build the system. Can you build the monolithic [[OpenJDK]] using its original make files?
		+
		+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 12:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
		+
	</div>		</div>

82.113.106.15: Comment provided by Ivan - via ArticleComments extension

2009-06-26T11:22:57Z

Comment provided by Ivan - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 26 June 2009
Line 32:		Line 32:
	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 11:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 11:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

		+	</div>
		+	== Ivan said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	You are doing a great job! I can't wait to lay my hands on modular JDK! (unfortunately I was not able to build JDK myself as you described)
		+
		+	--Ivan 13:22, 26 June 2009 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

JaroslavTulach at 11:54, 17 June 2009

2009-06-17T11:54:00Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 17 June 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:

	<div class='commentBlock'>		<div class='commentBlock'>
-	You create a humungeous dataset based on an Architectural Description Modelling Language (ADML) that captures the dependencies of every component. Then you set to work to tease apart the interdependencies so that you have some clearly deliniated system components.	+	You create a humungeous dataset based on an [[wikipedia::Architecture_description_language\|Architectural Description Modelling Language]] (ADML) that captures the dependencies of every component. Then you set to work to tease apart the interdependencies so that you have some clearly deliniated system components.

	Start now and you should have a good result in a couple of years. It'll need full time work, at least to marshall the components into an overall system model.		Start now and you should have a good result in a couple of years. It'll need full time work, at least to marshall the components into an overall system model.
Line 26:		Line 26:

	--[http://www.scrumit.co.uk mel pullen] 00:17, 17 June 2009 (CEST)		--[http://www.scrumit.co.uk mel pullen] 00:17, 17 June 2009 (CEST)
		+
		+	Nice outlook. I should correct my expectations then! I need result in half a year and moreover I need to keep [[BackwardCompatibility]] - e.g. not only tear things apart but do it in a way that when composed together everything will look like it used to!
		+
		+
		+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 11:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
		+
	</div>		</div>

89.240.25.120: Comment provided by mel pullen - via ArticleComments extension

2009-06-16T22:17:48Z

Comment provided by mel pullen - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 16 June 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 14:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 14:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

		+	</div>
		+	== mel pullen said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	You create a humungeous dataset based on an Architectural Description Modelling Language (ADML) that captures the dependencies of every component. Then you set to work to tease apart the interdependencies so that you have some clearly deliniated system components.
		+
		+	Start now and you should have a good result in a couple of years. It'll need full time work, at least to marshall the components into an overall system model.
		+
		+	If you think I'm speaking from experience, you're right.
		+
		+
		+	--[http://www.scrumit.co.uk mel pullen] 00:17, 17 June 2009 (CEST)
	</div>		</div>

JaroslavTulach at 14:22, 16 June 2009

2009-06-16T14:22:22Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 16 June 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:

	--Rich Unger 01:57, 16 June 2009 (CEST)		--Rich Unger 01:57, 16 June 2009 (CEST)
		+
		+	Hello Rich, thanks for your note. To make things better, the IApplet would have to be defined in '''java.beans''' module. Moreover it would not be compatible to change the method signature in AppletInitializer, there would have to be new AppletInitializer2 that would take IApplet. This could work, but I am horrified: I've just found out that there is a static method in '''Beans''' class that takes AppletInitializer as an argument. That is unexpected complication.
		+
		+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 14:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
		+
	</div>		</div>

204.14.239.208: Comment provided by Rich Unger - via ArticleComments extension

2009-06-15T23:57:20Z

Comment provided by Rich Unger - via ArticleComments extension

New page

<noinclude>Comments on [[Modular Java SE]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Rich Unger said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Would it be a compatible change to introduce a new interface, which Applet implements (for discussion purposes, let's call it IApplet), and change the signature of AppletInitializer to take IApplet instead of Applet?

--Rich Unger 01:57, 16 June 2009 (CEST)
</div>