Talk:DXR3 - Revision history

JaroslavTulach at 07:18, 29 March 2013

2013-03-29T07:18:45Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 29 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<noinclude>Comments on [[DXR3]]		<noinclude>Comments on [[DXR3]]
	<comments />		<comments />
-	~~----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>~~
-
-	~~== Brady said ... ==~~
-
-	~~<div class='commentBlock'>~~
-	~~Do you have a spam issue on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; many of us have created some nice~~
-	~~procedures and we are looking to trade methods with others, why not shoot me an e-mail~~
-	~~if interested.~~
-
-	~~--[http://www.getridofmanboobstoday.net/ Brady] 06:24, 29 June 2012 (CEST)~~
-	~~</div>~~
	== Rob in KC said ... ==		== Rob in KC said ... ==

	<div class='commentBlock'>		<div class='commentBlock'>
-	Hey, I was given a Hollywood plus card recently and was unable to get the modules to compile before I found your patches. Thanks for the translation of old to new kernel calls.	+	Hey, I was given a Hollywood plus card recently and was unable to get the modules to compile before I found your patches. Thanks for the translation of old to new kernel calls.

-	If the DXR/Hplus was being actively supported today, I wonder if it would be in DVB or V4L(2). I kind of think those two subsystems are going to get merged in the future and there will be (yet) another round of backwards incompatibilities to deal with.	+	If the DXR/Hplus was being actively supported today, I wonder if it would be in DVB or V4L(2). I kind of think those two subsystems are going to get merged in the future and there will be (yet) another round of backwards incompatibilities to deal with.

	Thanks again!!!		Thanks again!!!

		+	--Rob in KC 18:20, 26 March 2013 (CET)

-	--~~Rob in KC 18~~:20, 26 March 2013 (~~CET~~)	+	I don't use [[DXR3]] anymore, but I am glad my work was useful. Thanks for dropping note.
-	~~</div>~~	+	--[[User:JaroslavTulach\|JaroslavTulach]] 07:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

216.43.44.69: Comment provided by Rob in KC - via ArticleComments extension

2013-03-26T17:20:38Z

Comment provided by Rob in KC - via ArticleComments extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 26 March 2013
Line 11:		Line 11:

	--[http://www.getridofmanboobstoday.net/ Brady] 06:24, 29 June 2012 (CEST)		--[http://www.getridofmanboobstoday.net/ Brady] 06:24, 29 June 2012 (CEST)
		+	</div>
		+	== Rob in KC said ... ==
		+
		+	<div class='commentBlock'>
		+	Hey, I was given a Hollywood plus card recently and was unable to get the modules to compile before I found your patches. Thanks for the translation of old to new kernel calls.
		+
		+	If the DXR/Hplus was being actively supported today, I wonder if it would be in DVB or V4L(2). I kind of think those two subsystems are going to get merged in the future and there will be (yet) another round of backwards incompatibilities to deal with.
		+
		+	Thanks again!!!
		+
		+
		+	--Rob in KC 18:20, 26 March 2013 (CET)
	</div>		</div>

74.118.194.152: Comment provided by Brady - via ArticleComments extension

2012-06-29T04:24:34Z

Comment provided by Brady - via ArticleComments extension

New page

<noinclude>Comments on [[DXR3]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Brady said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Do you have a spam issue on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; many of us have created some nice
procedures and we are looking to trade methods with others, why not shoot me an e-mail
if interested.

--[http://www.getridofmanboobstoday.net/ Brady] 06:24, 29 June 2012 (CEST)
</div>