Chuck Norris - Revision history

JaroslavTulach at 09:18, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T09:18:16Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 13 December 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage in [[Swing]]. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] creation had not preceeded [[Swing]] by few months. Then it was too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learned to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.		At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage in [[Swing]]. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] creation had not preceeded [[Swing]] by few months. Then it was too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learned to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.

-	The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] ~~use~~ can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:	+	The upside of this case is that each developer using [[NetBeans]] [[API]] can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:

	{{#ev:youtube\|J1E_-lVujMg}}		{{#ev:youtube\|J1E_-lVujMg}}

JaroslavTulach at 09:17, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T09:17:32Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 13 December 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more.		I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more.

-	At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage in [[Swing]]. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] creation ~~has~~ not preceeded [[Swing]] by few months. Then it was too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learned to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.	+	At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage in [[Swing]]. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] creation had not preceeded [[Swing]] by few months. Then it was too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learned to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.

	The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:		The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:

JaroslavTulach at 09:17, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T09:17:01Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 13 December 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more.		I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more.

-	At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage in [[Swing]]. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] creation ~~have~~ not preceeded [[Swing]] by few months. Then it was too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learned to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.	+	At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage in [[Swing]]. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] creation has not preceeded [[Swing]] by few months. Then it was too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learned to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.

	The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:		The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:

JaroslavTulach at 09:16, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T09:16:40Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:16, 13 December 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more.		I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more.

-	At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage in [[Swing]]. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] ~~creationg~~ have not preceeded [[Swing]] by few months. Then it was too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learned to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.	+	At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage in [[Swing]]. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] creation have not preceeded [[Swing]] by few months. Then it was too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learned to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.

	The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:		The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:

JaroslavTulach at 09:16, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T09:16:02Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:16, 13 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Everyone who knows [[wikipedia:Chuck Norris\|Chuck Norris]] knows that he can do magical things. During our [[Linz]] 2010 [[NetBeans]] Certified Training [[Toni Epple]] came up with new, yet unknown, Chuck's capability. ''Chuck can instantiate abstract classes!''		Everyone who knows [[wikipedia:Chuck Norris\|Chuck Norris]] knows that he can do magical things. During our [[Linz]] 2010 [[NetBeans]] Certified Training [[Toni Epple]] came up with new, yet unknown, Chuck's capability. ''Chuck can instantiate abstract classes!''

-	I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more. At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] ~~was~~ not ~~older than~~ [[Swing]]. ~~Now~~ it is too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we ~~learn how~~ to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.	+	I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more.
		+
		+	At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage in [[Swing]]. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] creationg have not preceeded [[Swing]] by few months. Then it was too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learned to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.

	The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:		The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:

JaroslavTulach at 09:12, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T09:12:40Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 13 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Everyone who knows [[wikipedia:Chuck Norris\|Chuck Norris]] knows that he can do magical things. During our [[Linz]] 2010 [[NetBeans]] Certified Training [[Toni Epple]] came up with new, yet unknown, Chuck's capability. ''Chuck can instantiate abstract classes!''		Everyone who knows [[wikipedia:Chuck Norris\|Chuck Norris]] knows that he can do magical things. During our [[Linz]] 2010 [[NetBeans]] Certified Training [[Toni Epple]] came up with new, yet unknown, Chuck's capability. ''Chuck can instantiate abstract classes!''

-	I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more. At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] was not older than [[Swing]]. Now it is too late to change the name (as we would break [[~~backword~~ compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learn how to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.	+	I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more. At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] was not older than [[Swing]]. Now it is too late to change the name (as we would break [[backward compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learn how to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.

	The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:		The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:

JaroslavTulach at 09:12, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T09:12:26Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 13 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Everyone who knows [[wikipedia:Chuck Norris\|Chuck Norris]] knows that he can do magical things. During our [[Linz]] 2010 [[NetBeans]] Certified Training [[Toni Epple]] came up with new, yet unknown, Chuck's capability. ''Chuck can instantiate abstract classes!''		Everyone who knows [[wikipedia:Chuck Norris\|Chuck Norris]] knows that he can do magical things. During our [[Linz]] 2010 [[NetBeans]] Certified Training [[Toni Epple]] came up with new, yet unknown, Chuck's capability. ''Chuck can instantiate abstract classes!''

		+	I was just talking about one [[NetBeans]] [[API]] - [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes] and I had to explain why certain [[NetBeans]] classes are improperly named. Like [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]. In spite of its name it is class that can be instantiated (althrough it is usually subclassed in order to be useful). Well, yeah, it does not have [[Good Name]]. A name like '''DefaultNode''' would suite that class more. At least this is the convention used by [[Swing]]. There is an interface and then there is a ''default'' implementation that simplifies the interface usage. We could have followed this naming practise, if the [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/ Nodes API] was not older than [[Swing]]. Now it is too late to change the name (as we would break [[backword compatibility]]) and not gained much. Rather we learn how to live with [http://bits.netbeans.org/6.9.1/javadoc/org-openide-nodes/org/openide/nodes/AbstractNode.html AbstractNode]'s name.

-		+	The upside of this is that each [[NetBeans]] [[API]] use can feel like [[Chuck Norris]] for a moment! Everyone can ''instantiate abstract node!''. Enjoy this magnificent power and please don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:
-	~~Btw~~. don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee\|Bruce Lee]]:	+

	{{#ev:youtube\|J1E_-lVujMg}}		{{#ev:youtube\|J1E_-lVujMg}}

JaroslavTulach: New page: Everyone who knows Chuck Norris knows that he can do magical things. During our Linz 2010 NetBeans Certified Training Toni Epple came up with new, ye...

2010-12-13T08:50:22Z

New page: Everyone who knows Chuck Norris knows that he can do magical things. During our Linz 2010 NetBeans Certified Training Toni Epple came up with new, ye...

New page

Everyone who knows [[wikipedia:Chuck Norris|Chuck Norris]] knows that he can do magical things. During our [[Linz]] 2010 [[NetBeans]] Certified Training [[Toni Epple]] came up with new, yet unknown, Chuck's capability. ''Chuck can instantiate abstract classes!''

Btw. don't misplace [[Chuck Norris]] and [[wikipedia:Bruce Lee|Bruce Lee]]:

{{#ev:youtube|J1E_-lVujMg}}

[[Category:Video]]