Bck2Brwsr 0.10 - Revision history

JaroslavTulach at 17:29, 15 September 2014

2014-09-15T17:29:59Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 15 September 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:
	</source>		</source>

-	My experience from implementing lambdas in [[Bck2Brwsr]] [[VM]] was so horrible that [[I]] had to express my hate of [[invokeDynamic]] in a [[InvokeDynamic\|dedicated essay]]. Such instruction should have never be added into the [[JVM]] specification!	+	My experience from implementing lambdas in [[Bck2Brwsr]] [[VM]] was so horrible that [[I]] had to express my hate of [[invokeDynamic]] in a [[InvokeDynamic\|dedicated essay]]. Such instruction should have never be added into the [[JVM]] specification! See the ''Lambdas Go [[Bck2Brwsr]]'' video:
		+
		+	{{#ev:youtube\|ATp7WgUCIbU}}

	Support for [[JDK]]8 defender and interface static methods. In the following example the method '''defaultValue''' properly returns ''42'' in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:		Support for [[JDK]]8 defender and interface static methods. In the following example the method '''defaultValue''' properly returns ''42'' in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:
Line 44:		Line 46:
	}		}
	</source>		</source>
		+
		+
		+	[[Category:Video]]

JaroslavTulach at 06:43, 15 September 2014

2014-09-15T06:43:01Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:43, 15 September 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~Using Object.defineProperty to make sure the [[JavaScript]] Object has all the methods of {{JDK\|java/lang\|Object}}, while those methods do not show up during iteration~~
-
-	~~<source lang="javascript">~~
-	~~for (var p in anObject) {~~
-	~~console.log('A prop found ' + p);~~
-	}
-	~~</source>~~
-
	The ahead-of-time mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]] (thanks to [[RetroLambda]] project). Following example properly returns "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] when '''compound''' methods is called:		The ahead-of-time mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]] (thanks to [[RetroLambda]] project). Following example properly returns "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] when '''compound''' methods is called:

Line 44:		Line 36:

	The support for [[Closures\|lamdas]] does not mean [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] supports [[JDK]]8 APIs. It does not. The libraries are still subset of [[JDK]]7 - one can use [[Closures\|lamdas]] only in own code so far. Technically it should not be a problem to backport [[JDK]]8, libraries - it just has not been done yet.		The support for [[Closures\|lamdas]] does not mean [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] supports [[JDK]]8 APIs. It does not. The libraries are still subset of [[JDK]]7 - one can use [[Closures\|lamdas]] only in own code so far. Technically it should not be a problem to backport [[JDK]]8, libraries - it just has not been done yet.
		+
		+	Using Object.defineProperty to make sure the [[JavaScript]] Object has all the methods of {{JDK\|java/lang\|Object}}, while those methods do not show up during iteration
		+
		+	<source lang="javascript">
		+	for (var p in anObject) {
		+	console.log('A prop found ' + p);
		+	}
		+	</source>

JaroslavTulach at 20:11, 14 September 2014

2014-09-14T20:11:15Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 14 September 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:
	</source>		</source>

-	My experience from implementing lambdas in [[Bck2Brwsr]] [[VM]] was so horrible that [[I]] had to express my hate of [[invokeDynamic]] in a [[InvokeDynamic\|dedicated essay]]. Such instruction should have never be ~~addeded in~~ [[JVM]] specification!	+	My experience from implementing lambdas in [[Bck2Brwsr]] [[VM]] was so horrible that [[I]] had to express my hate of [[invokeDynamic]] in a [[InvokeDynamic\|dedicated essay]]. Such instruction should have never be added into the [[JVM]] specification!

	Support for [[JDK]]8 defender and interface static methods. In the following example the method '''defaultValue''' properly returns ''42'' in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:		Support for [[JDK]]8 defender and interface static methods. In the following example the method '''defaultValue''' properly returns ''42'' in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:

JaroslavTulach at 20:10, 14 September 2014

2014-09-14T20:10:54Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 14 September 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:
	</source>		</source>

-	My experience from implementing lambdas in [[Bck2Brwsr]] [[VM]] was so horrible that I had to express my hate of [[invokeDynamic]] in a [[InvokeDynamic\|dedicated essay]]. Such instruction should have never be addeded in [[JVM]] specification!	+	My experience from implementing lambdas in [[Bck2Brwsr]] [[VM]] was so horrible that [[I]] had to express my hate of [[invokeDynamic]] in a [[InvokeDynamic\|dedicated essay]]. Such instruction should have never be addeded in [[JVM]] specification!

	Support for [[JDK]]8 defender and interface static methods. In the following example the method '''defaultValue''' properly returns ''42'' in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:		Support for [[JDK]]8 defender and interface static methods. In the following example the method '''defaultValue''' properly returns ''42'' in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:

JaroslavTulach at 20:10, 14 September 2014

2014-09-14T20:10:27Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 14 September 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	</source>		</source>

-	The ahead-of-time mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]] (thanks to [[RetroLambda]] project). Following example properly ~~return~~ "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] when '''compound''' methods is called:	+	The ahead-of-time mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]] (thanks to [[RetroLambda]] project). Following example properly returns "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] when '''compound''' methods is called:

	<source lang="java">		<source lang="java">

JaroslavTulach at 20:09, 14 September 2014

2014-09-14T20:09:49Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 14 September 2014
Line 42:		Line 42:
	}		}
	</source>		</source>
		+
		+	The support for [[Closures\|lamdas]] does not mean [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] supports [[JDK]]8 APIs. It does not. The libraries are still subset of [[JDK]]7 - one can use [[Closures\|lamdas]] only in own code so far. Technically it should not be a problem to backport [[JDK]]8, libraries - it just has not been done yet.

JaroslavTulach at 19:53, 14 September 2014

2014-09-14T19:53:02Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 14 September 2014
Line 22:		Line 22:
	}		}
	</source>		</source>
		+
		+	My experience from implementing lambdas in [[Bck2Brwsr]] [[VM]] was so horrible that I had to express my hate of [[invokeDynamic]] in a [[InvokeDynamic\|dedicated essay]]. Such instruction should have never be addeded in [[JVM]] specification!

	Support for [[JDK]]8 defender and interface static methods. In the following example the method '''defaultValue''' properly returns ''42'' in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:		Support for [[JDK]]8 defender and interface static methods. In the following example the method '''defaultValue''' properly returns ''42'' in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:

JaroslavTulach at 16:53, 13 September 2014

2014-09-13T16:53:57Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, 13 September 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	</source>		</source>

-	The ahead-of-time mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]]. Following example properly return "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] when '''compound''' methods is called:	+	The ahead-of-time mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]] (thanks to [[RetroLambda]] project). Following example properly return "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] when '''compound''' methods is called:

	<source lang="java">		<source lang="java">

JaroslavTulach at 16:52, 13 September 2014

2014-09-13T16:52:20Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 13 September 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	</source>		</source>

-	The ahead-of-time mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]]. Following ~~methods~~ properly return "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:	+	The ahead-of-time mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]]. Following example properly return "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]] when '''compound''' methods is called:

	<source lang="java">		<source lang="java">

JaroslavTulach at 16:51, 13 September 2014

2014-09-13T16:51:42Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 13 September 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	</source>		</source>

-	The ~~''AOT''~~ mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]]. Following methods properly return "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:	+	The ahead-of-time mode has support for [[JDK]]8's [[Closure\|Lambdas]]. Following methods properly return "XXXXXXXXXX" in [[Bck2Brwsr 0.10]]:

	<source lang="java">		<source lang="java">