APIFest08:Task1.5 - Revision history

JaroslavTulach at 18:26, 28 September 2008

2008-09-28T18:26:53Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 28 September 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your APIs do not satisfy all the use cases that I had in my mind. That is my fault, I should have expressed myself clearly. Anyway it puts us into bad situation. Now you are not at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call off the ''ready'' state, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java]. There is proper description of the behaviour of the factory methods and two more tests. Please implement this in your solutions.		However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your APIs do not satisfy all the use cases that I had in my mind. That is my fault, I should have expressed myself clearly. Anyway it puts us into bad situation. Now you are not at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call off the ''ready'' state, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java]. There is proper description of the behaviour of the factory methods and two more tests. Please implement this in your solutions.

-	Please do it by Tue, Sep 30, 2008, noon. You do not need to retain any backward compatibility yet, however restrain yourself ~~for~~ doing too big changes to your APIs, they are all good, just satisfy the additional use cases, please.	+	Please do it by Tue, Sep 30, 2008, noon. You do not need to retain any backward compatibility yet, however restrain yourself from doing too big changes to your APIs, they are all good, just satisfy the additional use cases, please.

	Please accept my apology, and good luck!		Please accept my apology, and good luck!

JaroslavTulach at 18:25, 28 September 2008

2008-09-28T18:25:38Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 28 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for [[APIFest08:Task1.5\|participating]] in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions.	+	Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for [[APIFest08:Task1.5\|participating]] in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between your individual solutions.

	However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your APIs do not satisfy all the use cases that I had in my mind. That is my fault, I should have expressed myself clearly. Anyway it puts us into bad situation. Now you are not at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call off the ''ready'' state, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java]. There is proper description of the behaviour of the factory methods and two more tests. Please implement this in your solutions.		However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your APIs do not satisfy all the use cases that I had in my mind. That is my fault, I should have expressed myself clearly. Anyway it puts us into bad situation. Now you are not at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call off the ''ready'' state, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java]. There is proper description of the behaviour of the factory methods and two more tests. Please implement this in your solutions.

JaroslavTulach at 18:25, 28 September 2008

2008-09-28T18:25:05Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 28 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions.	+	Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for [[APIFest08:Task1.5\|participating]] in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions.

	However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your APIs do not satisfy all the use cases that I had in my mind. That is my fault, I should have expressed myself clearly. Anyway it puts us into bad situation. Now you are not at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call off the ''ready'' state, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java]. There is proper description of the behaviour of the factory methods and two more tests. Please implement this in your solutions.		However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your APIs do not satisfy all the use cases that I had in my mind. That is my fault, I should have expressed myself clearly. Anyway it puts us into bad situation. Now you are not at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call off the ''ready'' state, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java]. There is proper description of the behaviour of the factory methods and two more tests. Please implement this in your solutions.

JaroslavTulach at 18:21, 28 September 2008

2008-09-28T18:21:37Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 28 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions.		Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions.

-	However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your APIs do not satisfy all the use cases that I had in my mind. That is my fault, I should have expressed myself clearly. Anyway it puts us into bad situation. Now you are not at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call off the ''ready'' state, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java].	+	However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your APIs do not satisfy all the use cases that I had in my mind. That is my fault, I should have expressed myself clearly. Anyway it puts us into bad situation. Now you are not at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call off the ''ready'' state, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java]. There is proper description of the behaviour of the factory methods and two more tests. Please implement this in your solutions.

	Please do it by Tue, Sep 30, 2008, noon. You do not need to retain any backward compatibility yet, however restrain yourself for doing too big changes to your APIs, they are all good, just satisfy the additional use cases, please.		Please do it by Tue, Sep 30, 2008, noon. You do not need to retain any backward compatibility yet, however restrain yourself for doing too big changes to your APIs, they are all good, just satisfy the additional use cases, please.

	Please accept my apology, and good luck!		Please accept my apology, and good luck!

JaroslavTulach at 18:20, 28 September 2008

2008-09-28T18:20:38Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 28 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions.		Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions.

-	However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your ~~solutions~~ do not ~~much~~ the use cases that I had in my mind. That is ~~bad~~, as it ~~does not put~~ you ~~all~~ at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call of the ''ready'' ~~command~~, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round: ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java].	+	However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your APIs do not satisfy all the use cases that I had in my mind. That is my fault, I should have expressed myself clearly. Anyway it puts us into bad situation. Now you are not at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call off the ''ready'' state, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java].

	Please do it by Tue, Sep 30, 2008, noon. You do not need to retain any backward compatibility yet, however restrain yourself for doing too big changes to your APIs, they are all good, just satisfy the additional use cases, please.		Please do it by Tue, Sep 30, 2008, noon. You do not need to retain any backward compatibility yet, however restrain yourself for doing too big changes to your APIs, they are all good, just satisfy the additional use cases, please.

	Please accept my apology, and good luck!		Please accept my apology, and good luck!

JaroslavTulach at 18:18, 28 September 2008

2008-09-28T18:18:58Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 28 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions~~. And I am glad that some of you have introduced me to one new class from JDK! So far I have never heard about it, thanks~~.	+	Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions.

	However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your solutions do not much the use cases that I had in my mind. That is bad, as it does not put you all at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call of the ''ready'' command, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round: ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java].		However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your solutions do not much the use cases that I had in my mind. That is bad, as it does not put you all at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call of the ''ready'' command, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round: ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java].

JaroslavTulach: New page: Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in APIFest08! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions...

2008-09-28T18:18:27Z

New page: Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in APIFest08! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions...

New page

Thanks you all, dear twelve brave men for participating in [[APIFest08]]! I was really glad to see your submissions after the task 1. I really like the variety between individual solutions. And I am glad that some of you have introduced me to one new class from JDK! So far I have never heard about it, thanks.

However, I also have to apologize. I did try, to correctly specify the task 1 goals, however, looking at some of your solutions, I failed. Some of your solutions do not much the use cases that I had in my mind. That is bad, as it does not put you all at the same starting position for the real [[APIFest08]] game. That is why I have to, like a starter seeing a problem before 100m run, call of the ''ready'' command, and ask you to prepare once more. That is why I am calling round: ''one and half''. Please adjust your your solution according to additional tasks, described in [http://source.apidesign.org/hg/apifest08/rev/1ca35892ef26 Task1Test.java].

Please do it by Tue, Sep 30, 2008, noon. You do not need to retain any backward compatibility yet, however restrain yourself for doing too big changes to your APIs, they are all good, just satisfy the additional use cases, please.

Please accept my apology, and good luck!